Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorWolfe, Judith (Judith E.)
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, Simon
dc.coverage.spatial246 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T11:53:00Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T11:53:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/19852
dc.description.abstractStandard accounts of C. S. Lewis’s life and work have typically struggled to explain the complexity of the data and its apparent contradictions, and reduce his conversion to an inscrutable metaphysical event of unquestioned validity. Such treatments of Lewis are often constrained by the shared evangelical intent of the scholars concerned. This thesis argues, sympathetically but critically, that sense can more easily be made of Lewis’s life and work in general, and of his conversion and poetry in particular, if they are understood as the outworking of a dynamic psychological process, one bound up with his failure in early manhood to achieve success (in terms of either recognition or creative potency) as a poet. It argues further that after his conversion his creativity was hampered by the metaphysical constraints he placed on it, which were themselves partly an expression of neurotic demands he made on himself as a consequence of the earlier failure. In giving such an account, the thesis avoids the pitfalls of a Freudian analysis (the only kind to which Lewis has so far been subjected). Instead, the methodology used draws on the psychoanalytical theories of Karen Horney as applied within a broader humanist framework. Horney’s theory posits the imaginative creation in the neurotic person’s mind of an idealized self as a substitute for the real self, which is despised (Chapter 2). The idealized self must then be defended from the incursions of reality by the adoption of various defensive postures (Chapters 3 and 4). These postures, however, offer only partial solutions to the neurotic conflict and are inherently unstable, providing a spurious sense of integration (Chapter 5), as evidenced by the shifting from one solution to another in moments of crisis. Lewis is shown both to have undergone this self-idealization and, to some degree, to have intuited it, without extricating himself entirely from the process (Chapter 6).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectC. S. Lewisen_US
dc.subjectKaren Horneyen_US
dc.subjectErich Frommen_US
dc.subjectLudwig Feuerbachen_US
dc.subjectTheologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychoanalysisen_US
dc.subjectNeo-Freudianismen_US
dc.subjectNeurosisen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectSelfhooden_US
dc.subjectImaginationen_US
dc.subjectPoetryen_US
dc.subjectReligious conversionen_US
dc.subject.lccPR6023.E90Z5V2
dc.subject.lcshLewis, C. S. (Clive Staples), 1898-1963--Psychologyen
dc.subject.lcshNeurosesen
dc.subject.lcshPsychoanalysisen
dc.subject.lcshConversion--Christianityen
dc.titleC. S. Lewis and the neurotic imagination : a Horneyan analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-04-16
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 16th April 2025en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-19852


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record