Tool use in great apes and human children : the impact of prior experience and visual feedback
Abstract
Human and primate tool use has been the focus of intensive research for many
decades. Studies with non-human great apes are of special interest for the question
when certain cognitive abilities evolved. This thesis investigates the role of prior
experience and visual feedback in great apes’ and human children’s tool use. Prior
experience with tools is normally regarded as beneficial, helping individuals to find
successful strategies. Also, visual feedback and additional information about the
solution of a problem can deliver crucial insight into task components. Following an
introductory and a methodological chapter, Chapter 3 explores the role of visual
feedback and additional information in great ape problem-solving using the Floating
Peanut Task (FPT), which requires pouring water into a tube to extract an object.
Findings suggest that visual feedback was necessary for success at first, but later
became redundant, and end-state information (seeing a water-filled tube) helped
some individuals independently.
As a downside of experience, familiar strategies may restrict the analysis of novel
problems. Most interestingly, prior use of a tool can discourage using it with a novel
function (functional fixedness effect). Chapter 4 investigates functional fixedness in 6- to 8-year-old children using the FPT, focusing on how prior tool use and task
presentation predict success. Findings suggest low success rates overall and no effect
of experience; however, greater tool salience increased success. Chapter 5 investigates
functional fixedness in great apes, varying their experience with three tools to be used
each with a novel function. Prior experience lowered success and increased latency on novel problems, and prior use as a food item kept apes from using a bread stick as a
raking tool. Chapter 6 discusses the overall findings in terms of the evolutionary origins
of the negative impact of prior experience with tools, object representations, and
learning mechanisms.
Type
Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy
Rights
Embargo Reason: Embargo period has ended, thesis made available in accordance with University regulations
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.