Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHarris, Julie
dc.contributor.advisorAles, Justin Michael
dc.contributor.authorLee, Abigail Rachael Ingle
dc.coverage.spatial294 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15T11:07:22Z
dc.date.available2019-11-15T11:07:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18935
dc.description.abstractAs animals that move in a 3D world and interact with 3D objects, it is very important for our survival that our visual systems provide two- and three-dimensional motion perception. Over 4 experimental chapters, we used psychophysical methods to consider several questions about how the human brain processes speed information in two and three dimensions. In Chapter 2, we investigated whether making three-dimensional motion more realistic than in many previous human vision studies, by adding accelerations on the retina to our stimuli, improved our ability to discriminate speed changes. We found that adding retinal acceleration to our stimuli did not offer performance enhancement. In Chapter 3, we wanted to understand whether monocular or binocular cues were more important for discriminating speed changes for motion in depth. Our results were inconclusive, but the apparent difficulty of the speed change discrimination task led us to compare performance in these tasks to that for speed discrimination: we found speed change discrimination to be more difficult. It is often possible to use distance or duration information for speed discrimination, but not for speed change discrimination, so we also investigated whether participants use speed information for speed discrimination. Participants used a range of cues, and may have changed the cue they used from trial to trial. In Chapter 4, we investigated with novel experimental designs whether participants used speed, distance, duration or a combination of cues to make speed and speed change discrimination judgements. We found participants used speed information alone for both tasks. Finally, in Chapter 5 we considered whether speed change discrimination was difficult because speed information was combined over space or time. Neither combination of speed information across time, or across space, was responsible speed change discrimination difficulty. Overall, our findings contribute to our understanding of speed perception for moving objects.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC; https://bbsrc.ukri.org/) [grant number BB/M010996/1 to Abigail R I Lee, BB/N018516/1 to Justin M Ales and BB/M001660/1 to Julie M Harris]." -- Fundingen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectMotion perceptionen_US
dc.subjectSpeed discriminationen_US
dc.subjectMotion in depthen_US
dc.subjectSpeed change discriminationen_US
dc.subject.lccQP493.L4
dc.subject.lcshMotion perception (Vision)en
dc.titleThe visual processing of speed in two and three dimensionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2022-11-07
dc.rights.embargoreasonPrint and electronic copy restricted until 7th November 2022en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-18935


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International