The psychology of crowd policing
Abstract
Traditional psychological explanations of crowd theory have decontextualised events
and obscured the fact that crowd incidents are typically inter group encounters. This
has led to research being rooted in the crowd whilst ignoring the other parties who
may be present - including the police - and how events develop as function of the
interaction between the two. The studies reported in this thesis attempted to provide
insights into the decision making of senior public order officers of the Metropolitan
Police utilising a variety of qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Four main
studies are reported. In the first study (of police training) a grounded theory analysis
revealed that the police have a fear of the crowd which is seen in a concern with
provoking violence by being too harsh or permitting violence by being too lenient. The
balance of harshness and leniency is informed by accountability considerations arising
from internal and external sources and the phase of violence the officers perceived
themselves to be in. In the second study, the relationship of accountability and phase
was manipulated in a controlled experimental setting providing supportive evidence for
the grounded theory model. The third was a series of pilot participant observation
studies which looked at the policing of the Muslim festivals of Eid al Fitr and the Sikh
festivals of Vaisakhi. These studies raised practical issues and was used in designing
the fourth study which looked at the 'in vivo' processes of decision making during the
biggest public order event in London of 1999. This confirmed and extended the focus
on the importance of accountability concerns in senior officer decision making; firstly
by showing them to be more complex than was originally thought, secondly by
showing how those in different positions within the police had different accountability
concerns, and thirdly by showing that such different concerns could lead to conflict
between different sections of the police. The implications of this research and the
foundations of future research are also discussed.
Type
Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.