St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Art History (School of)
  • Art History
  • Art History Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Art History (School of)
  • Art History
  • Art History Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Art History (School of)
  • Art History
  • Art History Theses
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Returning to the 'soil of the sensible' : phenomenological readings of Robert Morris's and Richard Serra's minimalist sculpture

Thumbnail
View/Open
SandraKayeAlexanderMPhilThesis.pdf (24.51Mb)
Date
2000
Author
Alexander, Sandra Kaye
Supervisor
Hopkins, David
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Abstract
This assessment of the Minimalist sculpture of artists Robert Morris and Richard Serra endeavours not only to describe the ways in which Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological philosophy has been utilised to analyse the formal character of their work, but also to question the extent to which critical interpretations of such artworks may lay claim to their intended meaning. Firstly, Merleau-Ponty's significant text, the Phenomenology of Perception, will be introduced by exploring a number of its themes relating to perception and to how the body acts as a locus for human experience within the phenomenal world. Secondly, it will be shown how notable comments taken from the Phenomenology have been discussed in relation to several of Robert Morris's Minimalist artworks made between 1962 and 1969. Next, additional ideas taken from the Phenomenology will be brought to bear on the Minimalist sculpture of Richard Serra whose artworks and writings from between 1966 and 1980 have also been interpreted, like those of Morris, to be products of a general phenomenological 'sensibility'. Yet as part of the conclusion to this thesis, the contemporary, critical reception of Morris's and Serra's works will be discussed and particularly, the problematic ways in which Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological theory has been used by commentators to 'explain' several of the non-traditional aspects of their practice. This ultimately serves to bring into question the applicability of such theory to these artists' production. Firstly, we will inspect what evidence is provided by Morris's and Serra's artworks and writings which would support their connection with Pontean theory. Secondly, we will look at just how critics cite Merleau-Ponty's text as a source for Minimalist practice. At the end of such analyses, we may be better able to assess whether the rigorous interpretation of many of these artists' works by way of the Phenomenology is justified, or whether this critical trend is a misapplication of a complex philosophical theory to an equally complex and multivalent form of art practice.
Type
Thesis, MPhil Master of Philosophy
Collections
  • Art History Theses
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/15309

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter