Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorBuckley, Emma
dc.contributor.advisorRossignoli, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorVettor, Letizia
dc.coverage.spatialxiv, 307 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-06T16:43:04Z
dc.date.available2017-11-06T16:43:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12013
dc.description.abstractThis thesis contextualises and explores the reconceptualization of the myth of Eteokles and Polyneices in Greek, Latin and Italian tragedy, the literary genre that more than any other offers the opportunity to trace its progressive transformation across a series of relatively continuous and consistent phases. Within these limits, this study represents the first comprehensive, systematic and detailed comparative analysis of the cultural development of this myth, charting the shaping of its key themes: war and rivalry, autochthony and patriotism, the connection between incest, parricide and fratricide, the effects of predestination/family curse, the clash between private and public interests, and the legitimate limits of power. By means of a close examination of the thesis’ main corpus (constituted by Aeschylus’ Seven against Thebes, Sophocles’ Antigone, Oedipus Tyrannos and Oedipus at Colonus, Euripides’ Phoenician Women, Seneca’s Oedipus and Phoenissae, Dolce’s Giocasta and Alfieri’s Polinice) this dissertation demonstrates that the brothers are not merely two stereotypical types whose characterisation as mortal enemies remains static and unvaried. Although their rivalry never stops, the meaning, dynamic and purpose of their struggle are progressively but profoundly transformed throughout the centuries. In particular, I argue that the martial component that initially defined this myth, admittedly important throughout its legacy, is variously adapted to accommodate either a warning against the horrors of violence and subjugation, a cautionary appeal against overly aggressive foreign policy, a denunciation of the unbearable price of civil strife, or an aspiration to pacifism. In parallel, I analyse how the reflection on power and power struggle becomes increasingly predominant, eventually displacing the war theme as the main focus of this myth with a warning against the dangers of tyranny.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lccPN883.V48
dc.subject.lcshEuropean literature--Classical influencesen
dc.subject.lcshComparative literature--Classical and modernen
dc.subject.lcshMyth in literatureen
dc.titleImperii pretium : cultural development and conceptual transformations in the myth of Eteokles and Polyneices from Aeschylus to Alfierien_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Modern Languagesen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2021-03-30
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 30th March 2021en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record