Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorDe Groot, Gerard J.
dc.contributor.authorRitchie, George Forman Michael
dc.coverage.spatialvi, 161 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-25T13:21:25Z
dc.date.available2017-09-25T13:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11738
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is an analysis of the U.S. Army’s counter-insurgency doctrine from its roots to its application in South Vietnam during the Vietnam War. Contrary to the arguments of a specific section of scholars, the Army did not fail to defeat the National Liberation Front (NLF) because it did not use counter-insurgency methods. This thesis explains that the Army developed a comprehensive, albeit flawed, counter-insurgency doctrine and applied it in South Vietnam. While the Army’s counter-insurgency doctrine had serious deficiencies, it was the deeply unsound South Vietnamese government and the NLF’s formidable political revolution that were the primary reasons for its failure to achieve its objectives. This thesis utilises the body of literature produced by U.S. Army officers, officers of allied nations and academics during the creation of the Army’s counter-insurgency doctrine, as well as the field manuals that resulted from this research. These sources reveal the self-interest of Army commanders in their pursuit of a counter-insurgency mission, the purpose of which was to reverse the reductions enforced upon the Army during the 1950s. Crucially, these sources also display the Army’s perception of insurgencies in the developing world as the result of Communist-bloc attempts to expand communism. This perception, as well as the overconfidence of much of the Army’s leadership, was influential in shaping counter-insurgency doctrine. The Army’s self-interest put it on a path of its own making that led to the Vietnam War. The Army’s field manuals on counter-insurgency warfare show it expected to face an insurgency that was born out of the Cold War struggle and its methods reflected this belief. Therefore, it did not grasp that the NLF’s revolution had deep-seated historical roots. The Army’s counter-insurgency programmes, which emphasised civic action and destruction of guerrillas, were wholly ineffective in eradicating the NLF’s largely political revolution.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectVietnam Waren_US
dc.subjectU.S. Armyen_US
dc.subjectCounterinsurgencyen_US
dc.subjectInsurgencyen_US
dc.subjectViet Congen_US
dc.subjectNational Liberation Fronten_US
dc.subjectSouth Vietnamen_US
dc.subjectARVNen_US
dc.subjectCOINen_US
dc.subjectCold Waren_US
dc.subjectWars of national liberationen_US
dc.subject.lccU241.R58
dc.subject.lcshCounterinsurgency--United Statesen
dc.subject.lcshUnited States--Armed Forces--History--20th centuryen
dc.subject.lcshUnited States--Foreign relations--20th centuryen
dc.title'Pay any price, bear any burden': The U.S. Army's Counter-Insurgency Doctrine from Kennedy to the Vietnam Waren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnameMPhil Master of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


The following license files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's license for re-use is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International