Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorThom, Aaron James
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-28T13:55:54Z
dc.date.available2015-08-28T13:55:54Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-08
dc.identifier.citationThom, A. (2014). Tommaso Salini revisited: two new attributions. North Street Review: Arts and Visual Culture, 17, pp. 7-19.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2053-2024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ojs.st-andrews.ac.uk/index.php/nsr/article/view/719en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/7347
dc.description.abstractTommaso Salini (c.1575–1625) is a frequently forgotten Baroque artist that fell under Caravaggio’s spell, despite having a tempestuous relationship with the great painter. Salini, also known as Mao, was a friend of Giovanni Baglione, the Italian art biographer, who included Salini in his Le vite de’ pittori (1642). Salini is better remembered for his role in the Baglione libel trial of 1603 than he is for his oil paintings, which sit between Caravaggio’s innovative way of painting and Baglione’s mediocre Mannerism. Art historians have often shied away from exploring Salini’s career because the canvases that have carried his name seem stylistically dissimilar. The recent tendency has been to attribute these works to the anonymous ‘Pseudo-Salini’ painters, but this should form the topic of a separate article. The twentieth century saw art historians generously attribute an excessive amount of work to Salini, and many of these pictures were probably done decades after his death. In order for Salini’s oeuvre to be presented with accuracy, connoisseurs have had to inspect the original works that Baglione mentions being by Salini’s hand, as well as the pictures that have been successfully attributed to him. Bearing in mind what Baglione wrote, Salini can be revealed as an innovate artist and still life specialist. This article includes a newly attributed still life (Museum of Fine Arts, Boston) as a forgotten Salini, as well as a refreshed attribution of the masterful Piping Shepherd Boy (Foundling Museum, London). These works add weight to Salini being a more famous and better-known painter in his own time than scholarship has shown.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSchool of Art History, University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNorth Street Review: Arts and Visual Cultureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright (c) The author(s). This is an open access article published in North Street Review. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0//)en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0//
dc.subjectConnoisseurshipen_US
dc.subjectCaravaggismen_US
dc.subjectAttributionen_US
dc.subject.lcshArt--Historyen_US
dc.titleTommaso Salini revisited: two new attributionsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US


The following licence files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright (c) The author(s). This is an open access article published in North Street Review. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0//)
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Copyright (c) The author(s). This is an open access article published in North Street Review. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0//)