Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHan, Jie
dc.coverage.spatial199en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T14:35:49Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T14:35:49Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/3204
dc.description.abstractOver the past 30 years, the Chinese economy has been going through complex transformation from a centrally planned towards a market economy. The reform of the enterprises has played an important part in this transformation. This is in addition to macro economy reforms, as well as changes in the institutional framework. The thesis examines the implications of macroeconomic, ownership structure, as well as comprehensive institutional framework changes for Chinese enterprises’ survival and R&D activities. I study the impact of both microeconomic factors and the macro economy on the financial distress of Chinese listed companies over a period of massive economic transition, 1995 to 2006. Using hazard regression analysis, I find substantial effects of firm level covariates (age, size, cash flow and gearing) on financial distress, but also significant roles for macroeconomic stability and institution effect. Business exits in my data on Chinese quoted firms are vanishingly rare, arguably because of active state protection for the failing firms. I investigate the firms’ innovation activity and efficiency of different ownership sectors. Ownership influence on R&D investment and efficiency is estimated, using productivity frontier function, for a sample of large and medium size Chinese industrial enterprises from 2000-2007. I found that the presence of state ownership is positively related to R&D investment, but negatively related to R&D performance. Foreign firms are technical leaders in Chinese industries and have advantage in R&D efficiency. My results also show significant cross industries differences in R&D effort and technical level. These point out that firms possessing more innovation resources and government support are not the ones performing better technically. I extend my study into a more general mixed duopoly model in which a welfare maximizing public firm competes with profit maximizing private firm in R&D. I assume that different operation strategy influence firms’ tolerance of R&D spillover which plays a key role in their R&D investment mount and technology efficiency. I prove that a public firm is more likely to share its R&D fruit and its higher R&D invest- ment is accompanied by lower efficiency. Overall, macroeconomy on firm survival and ownership structure on firm innovation activities are channels to understand Chinese economy reform. Because conditions in China were similar in many ways to other transition economies, these results provide important information about the process of economic transformation more generally.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccHG3769.C5H2
dc.subject.lcshBusiness enterprises--Chinaen_US
dc.subject.lcshBusiness failures--Chinaen_US
dc.subject.lcshResearch, Industrial--Chinaen_US
dc.titleA study of financial distress and R&D in Chinese enterprisesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record