Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorReid, Gavin C.
dc.contributor.authorQi, Bei
dc.coverage.spatial279 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T14:52:46Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T14:52:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19055
dc.description.abstractThis thesis empirically compares the network effect in the mobile telecommunications between the United Kingdom and the People’s Republic of China. Institutional and regulatory differences between these countries enable an interesting comparative analysis. Data was obtained from questionnaires submitted to Chinese and UK university students. Using both quantitative and econometric techniques, this thesis finds that, under tariff-mediated network effects, consumers within the same social network tend to coordinate their choice of mobile service providers. This coordination behaviour is not significant in the absence of such induced network effects, suggesting that the source of influence is local network effects, rather than learning spillovers or peer pressure. The study has important implications for regulation in network industries. In the UK mobile market, regulation on telecommunications infrastructure and network access encourages competition between service providers; while in PR China, price regulation on network service limits the pricing strategy for firms, resulting in a market dominated by the incumbent.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccHE9715.G7Q5
dc.subject.lcshCell phone services industry--Great Britainen
dc.subject.lcshCell phone services industry--Chinaen
dc.subject.lcshTelecommunication--Great Britainen
dc.subject.lcshTelecommunication--Chinaen
dc.titleA network analysis of consumer choices of telecommunications providers in the UK and Chinaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2024-05-30
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 30th May 2024en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-19055


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record