Files in this item
Local development planning and bats in the UK : “an impenetrable fog” ?
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Matthews, Iain McCombe | |
dc.contributor.author | Cohen, Keith | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 212 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-24T10:25:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-24T10:25:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-06-22 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/1906 | |
dc.description | This study was supported by RPS Group plc (Planning & Development) | |
dc.description.abstract | Despite national and international protection, and the focus of conservation biology research, UK bat populations remain under threat from development. Cumulative impacts from development threaten bat populations with the “death of a thousand cuts”: direct mortality; loss of roost spaces; increasing road traffic and wind turbines killing more bats; disturbance, fragmentation and degradation of habitat may increase mortality by reducing fitness. It is timely to investigate the efficacy of conservation measures targeted at protecting bats in local development planning (“development management”), in particular the process of screening planning applications for potential impacts upon bats, acting in resolution of this Human-Wildlife Conflict. Examination of published guidance was combined with review of practitioner experience through Local Planning Authority (LPA) development management staff and bat survey consultants, with the aim of determining weaknesses in principles, mechanisms and resources. Key issues were the lack of political and managerial support, poor enforcement, a lack of expert natural heritage skills, inconsistent interpretation and application of guidelines, and significant gaps in guidance. For one LPA, 22% of sampled planning applications showed a high risk of potential impacts upon bats, yet only 1% had a bat survey undertaken; and 32% of known roost sites had been subject to one or more planning applications in 10 years. Only a few LPAs enjoy excellent access to expert natural heritage skills, biological data and advice from SNCOs. I present a multi-disciplinary synthesis to derive recommendations for process enhancement including seven good design principles, and seven key resources. The foundation to comprehensive adoption and enforcement is clear nationally consistent political support; thus engendering good practice e.g. all UK development applications should declare how biodiversity issues are addressed; research should address bat population dynamics, and responses to development impacts. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of St Andrews | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | |
dc.subject | Bats | en_US |
dc.subject | Chiroptera | en_US |
dc.subject | Development | en_US |
dc.subject | Planning | en_US |
dc.subject | UK | en_US |
dc.subject | Human wildlife conflict | en_US |
dc.subject | HWC | en_US |
dc.subject | Development management | en_US |
dc.subject | Material considerations | en_US |
dc.subject | Protected species | en_US |
dc.subject | Biodiversity conflict | en_US |
dc.subject | Cumulative impacts | en_US |
dc.subject | Natural heritage skills | en_US |
dc.subject | Screening | en_US |
dc.subject | EPS | en_US |
dc.subject | European protected species | en_US |
dc.subject | Conservation biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Biodiversity | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | QL737.C5C7 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Bats--Conservation--Great Britain | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Planning--Environmental aspects--Great Britain | en_US |
dc.title | Local development planning and bats in the UK : “an impenetrable fog” ? | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | RPS Group plc (Planning & Development) | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | MPhil Master of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.