Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Biology (School of) >
Biology >
Biology Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1906
This item has been viewed 26 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
KeithCohenMPhilThesis.PDF11.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Local development planning and bats in the UK : “an impenetrable fog” ?
Authors: Cohen, Keith
Supervisors: Matthews, Iain M.
Keywords: Bats
Chiroptera
Development
Planning
UK
Human wildlife conflict
HWC
Development management
Material considerations
Protected species
Biodiversity conflict
Cumulative impacts
Natural heritage skills
Screening
EPS
European protected species
Conservation biology
Biodiversity
Issue Date: 22-Jun-2011
Abstract: Despite national and international protection, and the focus of conservation biology research, UK bat populations remain under threat from development. Cumulative impacts from development threaten bat populations with the “death of a thousand cuts”: direct mortality; loss of roost spaces; increasing road traffic and wind turbines killing more bats; disturbance, fragmentation and degradation of habitat may increase mortality by reducing fitness. It is timely to investigate the efficacy of conservation measures targeted at protecting bats in local development planning (“development management”), in particular the process of screening planning applications for potential impacts upon bats, acting in resolution of this Human-Wildlife Conflict. Examination of published guidance was combined with review of practitioner experience through Local Planning Authority (LPA) development management staff and bat survey consultants, with the aim of determining weaknesses in principles, mechanisms and resources. Key issues were the lack of political and managerial support, poor enforcement, a lack of expert natural heritage skills, inconsistent interpretation and application of guidelines, and significant gaps in guidance. For one LPA, 22% of sampled planning applications showed a high risk of potential impacts upon bats, yet only 1% had a bat survey undertaken; and 32% of known roost sites had been subject to one or more planning applications in 10 years. Only a few LPAs enjoy excellent access to expert natural heritage skills, biological data and advice from SNCOs. I present a multi-disciplinary synthesis to derive recommendations for process enhancement including seven good design principles, and seven key resources. The foundation to comprehensive adoption and enforcement is clear nationally consistent political support; thus engendering good practice e.g. all UK development applications should declare how biodiversity issues are addressed; research should address bat population dynamics, and responses to development impacts.
Description: This study was supported by RPS Group plc (Planning & Development)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1906
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Biology Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)