The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Classics (School of) >
Classics >
Classics Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 90 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
plugin-view.php.pdfThe full text of this document is not available2.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The language of the gods : oblique communication and divine persuasion in Homer's Odyssey
Authors: Zekas, Christodoulos
Supervisors: Halliwell, Stephen
Greenwood, Emily
Keywords: Greek epic poetry
Homer, Odyssey
Greek gods in literature
Dialogue in literature
Persuasion in literature
Discourse analysis
Issue Date: Jun-2010
Abstract: Often praised for its sophistication in the narrator- and character-text, the Odyssey is regarded as the ultimate epic of a warrior’s much-troubled nostos. As a corollary of both its theme and the polytropia of the main hero, the poem explores extensively the motifs of secrecy and disguise. Apart from the lying tales of Odysseus, one important, albeit less obvious, example of the tendency to secrecy and disguise is the exchanges between the gods, which constitute a distinct group of speeches that have significant implications for the action of the poem. The aim of this dissertation is to study the divine dialogues of the Odyssey from the angle of communication and persuasion. Employing findings from narratology, discourse analysis, and oral poetics, and through close readings of the Homeric text, I argue that the overwhelming majority of these related passages have certain characteristics, whose common denominator is obliqueness. Apart from Helius’ appeal to Zeus (Chapter 2), distinctive in its own narratorial rendition, the rest of the dialogues, namely Hermes’ message-delivery to Calypso (Prologue), the two divine assemblies (Chapter 1), plus the exchanges of Zeus with Poseidon (Chapter 2) and Athena (Epilogue) conform to set patterns of communication. Within this framework, interlocutors strongly tend towards concealment and partiality. They make extensive use of conversational implicatures, shed light only on certain sides of the story while suppressing others, and present feigned or even exaggerated arguments in order to persuade their addressee. Direct confrontation is in principle avoided, and even when it does occur, it takes a rather oblique form. In this communicative scheme, the procedure of decision-making is not clear-cut, and the concept of persuasion is fluid and hidden behind the indirect and subtle dialogic process.
Other Identifiers:
Type: Thesis
Appears in Collections:Classics Theses

This item is protected by original copyright

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)