Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMiller, David Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Len
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-09T16:01:02Z
dc.date.available2015-04-09T16:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-20
dc.identifier.citationMiller , D L & Thomas , L 2015 , ' Mixture models for distance sampling detection functions ' , PLoS One , vol. 10 , no. 3 , e0118726 . https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0118726en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 26520107
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c43efce8-6960-4577-8f6b-0356efde3f9f
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84925878970
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7436-067X/work/29591668
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000352084200036
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6463
dc.descriptionFunding: EPSRC DTGen
dc.description.abstractWe present a new class of models for the detection function in distance sampling surveys of wildlife populations, based on finite mixtures of simple parametric key functions such as the half-normal. The models share many of the features of the widely-used “key function plus series adjustment” (K+A) formulation: they are flexible, produce plausible shapes with a small number of parameters, allow incorporation of covariates in addition to distance and can be fitted using maximum likelihood. One important advantage over the K+A approach is that the mixtures are automatically monotonic non-increasing and non-negative, so constrained optimization is not required to ensure distance sampling assumptions are honoured. We compare the mixture formulation to the K+A approach using simulations to evaluate its applicability in a wide set of challenging situations. We also re-analyze four previously problematic real-world case studies. We find mixtures outperform K+A methods in many cases, particularly spiked line transect data (i.e., where detectability drops rapidly at small distances) and larger sample sizes. We recommend that current standard model selection methods for distance sampling detection functions are extended to include mixture models in the candidate set.
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2015 Miller, Thomas. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleMixture models for distance sampling detection functionsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0118726
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record