Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorLavan, Myles
dc.contributor.advisorKönig, Jason
dc.contributor.advisorOmissi, Adrastos
dc.contributor.authorLindholmer, Mads Ortving
dc.coverage.spatialix, 203 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-08T14:17:08Z
dc.date.available2021-07-08T14:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23496
dc.description.abstractMy PhD analyses the imperial “admission” (the so-called “salutatio” and “adoratio”) from the Severans to Constantine and argues that this ritual played an active role in the construction of imperial power. Chapter 1, 2 and 4 focus on the development of the admission from the first century to Constantine I and provide a detailed reconstruction. Drawing on Clifford Geertz’s interpretive approach, I argue that the admission during the Principate presented the emperor as a traditional primus inter pares and that this continued under the Severans. This continuity heightened Severan power and legitimacy. The presentation of the emperor in his admission changed markedly in Late Antiquity as the monarchic and divine qualities of the emperor were stressed, which contributed to a thorough reorientation of the narrative of imperial power and legitimacy. The field of embodied cognition illuminates how such narratives were internalised by participants. Despite these discontinuities, elements of continuity between the Late Antique admission and the Principate persisted, and I argue that the imperial “salutatio” and “adoratio” were two manifestations of a long tradition of imperial admissions. In Chapter 3, 5 and 6, this institutional focus is paired with an exploration of how Cassius Dio, Claudius Mamertinus and the Historia Augusta’s anonymous author used the admission. I argue that this ritual plays a central role in all these authors’ construction of the good emperor, especially when emphasising the importance of civilitas. These authors’ literary representations of the admission also aimed to shape its ritual narrative, thereby undermining or supporting imperial self-presentation. This highlights that not only the emperor but also the elite could derive power from the admission. This is supported by Chapter 7 which argues that participation in the admission ensured the elite influence and power, since this ritual constituted a highly reliable context for petitioning the emperor.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"I am also grateful for the financial support from the SGSAH, the School of Classics at the University of St Andrews and St Leonard’s College." -- Acknowledgementsen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectRitualen_US
dc.subjectCeremonialen_US
dc.subjectRoman emperoren_US
dc.subjectSalutatioen_US
dc.subjectAdoratioen_US
dc.subjectAdmissionen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.subjectSeveransen_US
dc.subjectLate antiquityen_US
dc.subjectCassius Dioen_US
dc.subjectHistoria Augustaen_US
dc.subjectClaudius Mamertinusen_US
dc.subject.lccDG271.L5
dc.subject.lcshRitual--Romeen
dc.subject.lcshImperialism--Social aspects--Rome--Historyen
dc.subject.lcshRome--Politics and government--30 B.C.-476 A.D.en
dc.subject.lcshRome--History--Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.en
dc.titleRituals of power : the Roman imperial admission from the Severans to the fourth centuryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Classicsen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. St Leonard's Collegeen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2026-02-10
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic copy restricted until 10th February 2026en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/92


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record