Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorMcSwiggan, Linda
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T00:37:10Z
dc.date.available2019-11-29T00:37:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-03
dc.identifier256782284
dc.identifier44800474-ed54-43e8-9fba-b274f33874dd
dc.identifier85057580239
dc.identifier000487940900003
dc.identifier.citationO'Carroll , V , McSwiggan , L & Campbell , M 2019 , ' Practice educators’ attitudes and perspectives of interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional practice learning for students : a mixed-methods case study ' , Journal of Interprofessional Care , vol. 33 , no. 5 , pp. 414-423 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1551865en
dc.identifier.issn1356-1820
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5777-104X/work/61370257
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19023
dc.description.abstractInterprofessional collaboration (IPC) is important for the delivery of effective integrated health and social care systems. Interprofessional practice learning (IPPL) enables students to learn to work together within a relevant context and prepare for future IPC. While there is some evidence that negative attitudes impact on IPC and interprofessional education, there is a dearth of research on health and social work professionals’ attitudes and perspectives of IPC and IPPL opportunities for students. A mixed-methods case study was used to investigate practice educators’ attitudes and perspectives of IPC and IPPL for their students. Results showed that attitudes were positive and that mainly meso- and macro-level factors, as opposed to the micro level, impacted on the implementation of IPC and IPPL for students’ learning in practice settings. IPC was perceived to be best enabled by effective communication, established teams, IPPL for staff, and shared processes and policies. Close working proximity to other professionals encouraged informal communication and positive interprofessional relationships. Motivation and resources were perceived as enablers of IPPL, but there were often missed opportunities for IPPL. These findings suggest that further work is required to identify systems for improving IPC and to enhance IPPL opportunities for students learning within practice settings.
dc.format.extent932899
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interprofessional Careen
dc.subjectCase studyen
dc.subjectMixed methodsen
dc.subjectInterprofessional collaborationen
dc.subjectInterprofessional practice learningen
dc.subjectHealth and social careen
dc.subjectPractice educatorsen
dc.subjectLB2300 Higher Educationen
dc.subjectRA Public aspects of medicineen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccLB2300en
dc.subject.lccRAen
dc.titlePractice educators’ attitudes and perspectives of interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional practice learning for students : a mixed-methods case studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Office of the Principalen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Education Divisionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13561820.2018.1551865
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-11-29


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record