Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Faye
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Brent J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T14:30:06Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T14:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationDonnelly , F & Steele , B J 2019 , ' Critical security history : (de)securitisation, ontological security and insecure memories ' , European Journal of International Security , vol. 4 , no. 2 , pp. 209-226 . https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.5en
dc.identifier.issn2057-5645
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 258979352
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: b42eee56-2a85-48c4-afb6-49a8ed93745b
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85065718616
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000471817200005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17711
dc.description.abstractThis article makes a case for incorporating the concept of ‘Critical Security History’ (CSH) into security studies. While history plays a powerful role in a cornucopia of security stories, we contend that it often goes unnoticed in scholarly research and teaching. Against this backdrop, we present a detailed guide to study how history is told and enacted in non-linear ways. To do this, the article outlines how CSH can contribute to securitisation and ontological security studies. As shown, this lens casts a new light on the legacies of (de)securitisation processes and how they are commemorated. It also illustrates that ontological security studies have only begun to call into question the concept of historicity. Working through these observations, the article marshals insights from Halvard Leira's notion of ‘engaged historical amateurism’ to entice scholars interested in ‘doing’ CSH. While acknowledging that this research agenda is hard to achieve, our study of the 2012 Sarajevo Red Line project helps to illustrate the added value of trying to ‘do’ CSH in theory and in practice. We end with some reflections for future research and continued conversations.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of International Securityen
dc.rights© 2019, British International Studies Association. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.5en
dc.subjectCritical security historyen
dc.subjectSecuritisationen
dc.subjectOntological securityen
dc.subjectMemoriesen
dc.subjectEngaged amateurismen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleCritical security history : (de)securitisation, ontological security and insecure memoriesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.5
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record