Files in this item
Second-order logic is logic
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Clark, Peter | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Read, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Shapiro, Stewart | |
dc.contributor.author | Friend, Michèle Indira | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Michèle Indira | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T13:14:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T13:14:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/14753 | |
dc.description.abstract | "Second-order logic" is the name given to a formal system. Some claim that the formal system is a logical system. Others claim that it is a mathematical system. In the thesis, I examine these claims in the light of some philosophical criteria which first motivated Frege in his logicist project. The criteria are that a logic should be universal, it should reflect our intuitive notion of logical validity, and it should be analytic. The analysis is interesting in two respects. One is conceptual: it gives us a purchase on where and how to draw a distinction between logic and other sciences. The other interest is historical: showing that second-order logic is a logical system according to the philosophical criteria mentioned above goes some way towards vindicating Frege's logicist project in a contemporary context. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of St Andrews | |
dc.subject.lcc | BC128.F8 | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Logic, Symbolic and mathematical | en |
dc.title | Second-order logic is logic | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.