Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Philosophical, Anthropological & Film Studies (School of) >
Philosophy >
Philosophy Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/924
This item has been viewed 109 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Ira Kiourti PhD thesis.PDF1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Real impossible worlds : the bounds of possibility
Authors: Kiourti, Ira Georgia
Supervisors: Hawley, Katherine Jane
Priest, Graham
Read, Stephen
Keywords: Impossible worlds
Lewisian realism about possible worlds
Extending Lewisian realism into impossible worlds
Lewisian modal realism
Reductive theories of modality
David Lewis
Plenitude
Arbitrariness
Circularity
Recombination
Impossible worlds & the reduction of the modal
Ersatz impossibilia out of Lewis-worlds
Lewis-friendly ersatz worlds
Concrete impossible worlds
Actual truth versus truth simpliciter
Negation at concrete impossible worlds
Negation commutation
Concrete impossibilia & contradiction
Reasoning about Lewisian realism with impossibilia
Modality as world similarity
Relative Modality
Relative impossibilia
Logical similarity between worlds
"The logical laws of w"
Representing impossibilities about the plurality
Concrete impossibilism
Truth-at-w & literal truth
Issue Date: 25-Jun-2010
Abstract: Lewisian Genuine Realism (GR) about possible worlds is often deemed unable to accommodate impossible worlds and reap the benefits that these bestow to rival theories. This thesis explores two alternative extensions of GR into the terrain of impossible worlds. It is divided in six chapters. Chapter I outlines Lewis’ theory, the motivations for impossible worlds, and the central problem that such worlds present for GR: How can GR even understand the notion of an impossible world, given Lewis’ reductive theoretical framework? Since the desideratum is to incorporate impossible worlds into GR without compromising Lewis’ reductive analysis of modality, Chapter II defends that analysis against (old and new) objections. The rest of the thesis is devoted to incorporating impossible worlds into GR. Chapter III explores GR-friendly impossible worlds in the form of set-theoretic constructions out of genuine possibilia. Then, Chapters IV-VI venture into concrete impossible worlds. Chapter IV addresses Lewis’ objection against such worlds, to the effect that contradictions true at impossible worlds amount to true contradictions tout court. I argue that even if so, the relevant contradictions are only ever about the non-actual, and that Lewis’ argument relies on a premise that cannot be nonquestion- beggingly upheld in the face of genuine impossible worlds in any case. Chapter V proposes that Lewis’ reductive analysis can be preserved, even in the face of genuine impossibilia, if we differentiate the impossible from the possible by means of accessibility relations, understood non-modally in terms of similarity. Finally, Chapter VI counters objections to the effect that there are certain impossibilities, formulated in Lewis’ theoretical language, which genuine impossibilia should, but cannot, represent. I conclude that Genuine Realism is still very much in the running when the discussion turns to impossible worlds.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/924
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Philosophy Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)