Medicine (School of) >
Medicine Theses >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Development of a predictive DNA double strand break assay for the identification of individuals with high normal tissue radiosensitivity|
|Authors: ||Brown, Emma Jane Hay|
|Supervisors: ||MacDougall, Hugh|
|Issue Date: ||2008|
|Abstract: ||A genetically determined high level of intrinsic normal tissue radiosensitivity may account
for the 5% of patients who experience unexpectedly severe normal tissue side effects
following radiotherapy. The pre-treatment identification of these individuals by a
diagnostic test or “predictive assay “ may allow appropriate modification of treatment
plans and improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy.
Results from studies of cell-based assays measuring the response of a single cell type taken
from patients to in vitro irradiation have been inconsistent, leading to the opinion of many
that they are of no value in the prediction of normal tissue radiosensitivity.
A systematic review of the literature presented here, however, suggests that poor
methodology of study design often with inadequate control for those factors other than
normal tissue radiosensitivity which influence radiotherapy toxicity and lack of reporting
of assay precision means that it is difficult to form any conclusions, positive or negative
about the diagnostic accuracy of the cell-based assays studied so far. Analysis of
individual patient data extracted from these studies suggests that at least some of these
assays may possess some discriminatory value.
This finding justified an attempt to develop a novel cell-based assay based on the kinetics
of radiation-induced .H2AX in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Assay failure rate was high
and intra- and inter-sample assay reproducibility was poor for quantification by
microscopy but were better for flow cytometric analysis. A study of 8 volunteers, however,
demonstrated that intra-individual variation was higher than inter-individual variation in
assay results, strongly suggesting that poor assay reproducibility due to technical or
biological factors may limit the assay’s potential to identify radiosensitive individuals.
This suspicion needs to be confirmed in a clinical study of patients of known
radiosensitivity. As blood sample storage conditions affect assay results these will need to
be standardized to prevent confounding of results.|
|Publisher: ||University of St Andrews|
|Appears in Collections:||Medicine Theses|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.