Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Biology (School of) >
Biology >
Biology Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/743
This item has been viewed 45 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Stacey Munro PhD thesis.PDF10.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Investigation of the transcriptional response of Sulfolobus solfataricus to damaging agents
Authors: Munro, Stacey
Supervisors: White, Malcolm F.
Issue Date: 2009
Abstract: It is vital for the survival of an organism that it can repair damage to its DNA. Exogenous and endogenous sources of damage are dealt with by a variety of repair pathways that have evolved to repair specific types of damage. Organisms in the archaeal domain, the third domain of life, contain homologues of many of the eukaryotic repair proteins, however little is known about how damage is detected in the archaeal domain. Microarray studies in the archaeal species Sulfolobus solfataricus determined a number of genes whose expression was effected by UV radiation (work by Dr D Götz). The change in expression of nine of these genes was confirmed by RT real time PCR. The expression of these genes was then investigated after exposure to different damaging agents, Mitomycin C, Methyl methane sulfonate, Phleomycin and Hydrogen peroxide. The expression of two genes, transcription factor tfb-3 and cell division control gene cdc6-2, was up regulated in all damage conditions. There was a huge induction of the dps-like gene (sso2079) after hydrogen peroxide damage. Transcription from this genes promoter was shown to be strong in vitro (work by Dr S Paytubi) suggesting a repressor was controlling the gene in vivo. A palindromic repeat in the promoter of the dps-like gene was used to ‘fish’ for a transcriptional repressor and the Sso2273 protein, a homologue of the diphtheria toxin repressor (DtxR) from Corynebacterium diphtheria, was identified as a possible repressor. Sso2273 was expressed and purified, and its crystal structure solved, its paralogue, Sso0669, was also expressed and purified. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that the Sso2273 protein does not bind DNA, and had no effect on transcription from any promoter used in in vitro transcription assays. However Sso0669 appeared to inhibit transcription, although the inhibition was not sequence specific. A knockout strain of S. solfataricus PBL2025 missing the sso2273 gene was produced and used in microarray experiments in an attempt to determine the role of Sso2273 within the cell. The absence of Sso2273 appeared to have no effect on the expression of the dps-like gene, however strong repression of an operon containing genes involved in Sulphur assimilation was observed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/743
Other Identifiers: uk.bl.ethos.552274
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Biology Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)