Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Computer Science (School of) >
Computer Science >
Computer Science Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/702
This item has been viewed 8 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
TOCHIApril2004.pdf911.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Patterns of cooperative interaction: Linking ethnomethodology and design
Authors: Sommerville, I.
Martin, D.
Keywords: patterns
ethnomethodology
ethnography
interaction design
Issue Date: 2004
Citation: Martin, D. & Sommerville, I. (2004). 'Patterns of cooperative interaction: Linking ethnomethodology and design.' ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 11(1) pp. 59-89.
Abstract: Patterns of Cooperative Interaction are regularities in the organisation of work, activity, and interaction amongst participants, and with, through and around artefacts. These patterns are organised around a framework and are inspired by how such regularities are highlighted in ethnomethodologically-informed ethnographic studies of work and technology. They comprise a high level description and two or more comparable examples drawn from specific studies. Our contention is that these patterns form a useful resource for re-using findings from previous field studies, for enabling analysis and considering design in new settings. Previous work on the relationship between ethnomethodology and design has been concerned primarily in providing presentation frameworks and mechanisms, practical advice, schematisations of the ethnomethodologist's role, different possibilities of input at different stages in development, and various conceptualisations of the relationship between study and design. In contrast, this paper seeks to firstly discuss the position of patterns relative to emergent major topics of interest of these studies. Subsequently it seeks to describe the case for the collection of patterns based on findings, their comparison across studies and their general implications for design problems, rather than the concerns of practical and methodological interest outlined in the other work. Special attention is paid to our evaluations and to how they inform how the patterns collection may be read, used and contributed to, as well as to reflections on the composition of the collection as it has emerged. The paper finishes, firstly, with a discussion of how our work relates to other work on patterns, before some closing comments are made on the role of our patterns and ethnomethodology in systems design.
Version: Postprint
Description: © ACM, 2004. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1): 59-89, 10730516, (March 2004) http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/972648.972651
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/972648.972651
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/702
ISSN: 10730516
Type: Journal article
Publication Status: Published
Status: Peer reviewed
Publisher: ACM
Appears in Collections:Computer Science Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)