Divinity (School of) >
Divinity Theses >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Fides ex auditu: dogmatic theology and the ecclesial practice of music|
|Authors: ||Edwards, J. Andrew|
|Supervisors: ||Begbie, Jeremy|
|Keywords: ||Theology of music|
Doctrine of the logos/Word of God
Pope Benedict XVI/Joseph Ratzinger
|Issue Date: ||27-Jun-2008|
|Abstract: ||Any consideration of the aural reception of Christian faith must take the ecclesial practice of music and its relation to the divine logos into account. Specifically, the logos provides normativity for such music, as the latter endeavours to proclaim that divine Word. Contemporary theological reflections on music are made difficult by the modern development of the concept of taste, which has culminated in a radicalized subjectivity that eschews normative criteria. A reclamation of the normative role of the logos is thus required in the dogmatic theology of music.
Karl Barth’s theology is examined in order to establish the critical relation between proclamation and dogmatics. Barth’s praise of Mozart is reviewed to demonstrate how his detachment from a broader historical tradition confines him to a strictly formalist aesthetic that is unable to hear musical meaning. Further examination of
his early writings reveal how his critical revelatory dialectic, vis-à-vis his reading of the Auftrag, prohibits a proclamatory role for the ecclesial practice of music.
Pope Benedict XVI’s theology provides a fitting alternative, as his dogmatic
reflections assume a necessarily kerygmatic role for music that Barth denies. In this
Benedict is more in tune with the ancient Church Fathers. His dogmatic reflections on the “musified” logos are in dialectical tension with modern philosophies of music, as he espouses a Christian rationality over against modern secular/subjective reason. This dialectic is augmented with a comparison of Augustine and Kant on the practice of
counting. Finally, contrary to some readings, the normativity of Benedict’s musical logos
is not an oppressive force, hampering the freedom of musical performance.
A “descriptive” method of dogmatic reflection is finally recommended, in which the theology of music approximates a kind of journalistic “music criticism,” albeit one that listens for the Word of Christ, the hearing of which brings faith (Romans 10:17).|
|Publisher: ||University of St Andrews|
|Appears in Collections:||Divinity Theses|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.