Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Divinity (School of) >
Divinity >
Divinity Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/493
This item has been viewed 258 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Kate C Donahoe PhD thesis.pdf1.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: From self-praise to self-boasting : Paul's unmasking of the conflicting rhetorico-linguistic phenomena in 1 Corinthians
Authors: Donahoe, Kate C.
Supervisors: Longenecker, Bruce W.
Keywords: Boasting
Self-praise
Honor
Social status
Paul
Corinth
Corinthians
Wisdom
Sophists
Rhetoric
Plutarch
1 Cor 1:10-4:21
1 Cor 5:1-13
1 Cor 9:1-27
1 Cor 13:1-13
1 Cor 15:30-32
Jer 9:22-23
Boast
Leadership
Apollos
Party slogans
Factions
Patronage
Jer 9:22-23
1 Cor 4:1-21
Apostleship
1 Cor 4:6
1 Cor 1:26-31
Personality rhetoric
Gospel rhetoric
Paul's modus operandi
1 Cor 1:10-12
1 Cor 3:18-23
Kauxaomai
Alazoneia
Alazwn
Kauxhma
Issue Date: Jun-2008
Abstract: The thesis, entitled “From Self-Praise to Self-Boasting: Paul’s Unmasking of the Conflicting Rhetorico-Linguistic Phenomena in 1 Corinthians,” examines the rhetorical conventions of “boasting” and self-praise among those vying for social status and honor within the Greco-Roman world. While the terminological options for “boasting” and self-praise frequently overlap, a survey of these conventions demonstrates that the ancients possessed a categorical distinction between “boasting” and self-praise, which oftentimes conflicted with Paul’s distinction. Clear examples of this conflict appear in 1 Cor 1:10-4:21; 5:1-13; 9:1-27; 13:1-13; and 15:30-32, where Paul addresses the Corinthians’ overestimation of wisdom and eloquence, redirects the Corinthians’ attention away from loyalties to specific leaders to loyalty to Christ, redefines the standards by which the Corinthians should view themselves and their leaders, counters the Corinthians’ tendency to engage in anthropocentric “boasting,” and affirms his own apostolic ministry. It is the Corinthian community’s inability to grasp the application of theocentric “boasting” which leads Paul to address certain aspects and values of secular Corinth that have penetrated the Corinthian community. Thus, operating from an eschatological perspective, Paul critiques both the Corinthians’ attitudes and the Greco-Roman cultural values upon which their attitudes are based. Through irony, self-presentation, imitation, differentiating between theocentric and anthropocentric “boasting,” and distinguishing between personality and gospel rhetoric, Paul challenges the secular notions of social status, power, wisdom, leadership, and patronage and exhorts the Corinthians to focus their attention on their relationship with the Lord rather than on improving their social status or on increasing their honor.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/493
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Divinity Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)