Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Mathematics & Statistics (School of) >
Statistics >
Statistics Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/391
This item has been viewed 44 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
TAMARQUES2007.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Incorporating measurement error and density gradients in distance sampling surveys
Authors: Marques, Tiago Andre Lamas Oliveira
Supervisors: Buckland, Stephen T.
Pestana, Dinis D.
Keywords: Distance sampling
Measurement error
Assumption violation
Density gradient
Animal surveys
Transects
Issue Date: Nov-2007
Abstract: Distance sampling is one of the most commonly used methods for estimating density and abundance. Conventional methods are based on the distances of detected animals from the center of point transects or the center line of line transects. These distances are used to model a detection function: the probability of detecting an animal, given its distance from the line or point. The probability of detecting an animal in the covered area is given by the mean value of the detection function with respect to the available distances to be detected. Given this probability, a Horvitz-Thompson- like estimator of abundance for the covered area follows, hence using a model-based framework. Inferences for the wider survey region are justified using the survey design. Conventional distance sampling methods are based on a set of assumptions. In this thesis I present results that extend distance sampling on two fronts. Firstly, estimators are derived for situations in which there is measurement error in the distances. These estimators use information about the measurement error in two ways: (1) a biased estimator based on the contaminated distances is multiplied by an appropriate correction factor, which is a function of the errors (PDF approach), and (2) cast into a likelihood framework that allows parameter estimation in the presence of measurement error (likelihood approach). Secondly, methods are developed that relax the conventional assumption that the distribution of animals is independent of distance from the lines or points (usually guaranteed by appropriate survey design). In particular, the new methods deal with the case where animal density gradients are caused by the use of non-random sampler allocation, for example transects placed along linear features such as roads or streams. This is dealt with separately for line and point transects, and at a later stage an approach for combining the two is presented. A considerable number of simulations and example analysis illustrate the performance of the proposed methods.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/391
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Statistics Theses
Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling (CREEM) Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)