Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Biology (School of) >
Biology >
Biology Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3219
This item has been viewed 173 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
CarolineKingPhDThesis.pdf14.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Putting pollination quality into analyses of floral ecology: testing syndromes through pollinator performance
Authors: King, Caroline
Supervisors: Willmer, Pat
Issue Date: 19-Jul-2012
Abstract: Over recent years, the extent of specialised and generalised plant-pollinator relationships, and the predictive powers of floral traits (often grouped into “pollination syndromes”) as indicators of the most effective pollinators of plant species, have been questioned. Such studies, however, have used proxies such as visitation frequency rather than direct measurements of pollinator effectiveness (PE). The main objective of this thesis was to test the predictive powers of various pollination syndromes using a specific measure of PE: single-visit stigmatic pollen deposition (SVSPD). Six different classical pollination syndromes were tested, using 13 different plant species from tropical and temperate habitats, and in the case of flowers typical of the hummingbird, hoverfly, bee, oil flower and long-tongued insect syndromes, the expected pollinators were the most effective at a single-visit scale. For generalist pollination syndrome flowers, not all observed visitors were significant pollinators, and the species studied were not as broadly generalised as their visitor assemblages would suggest. In all 13 plant species, pollinator performance could appear consistent within functional visitor groups but was variable between visitor species, and in almost all cases not all of the observed visitors were effective pollinators. The pollinator performance proxies of visit duration and feeding behaviour were neither significantly, nor consistently, related to PE. Visit duration was not an accurate indicator of pollinator performance on its own, though it was useful when combined with SVSPD to define pollinator performance at a given time scale, for example per hour, per day or per season. My findings suggest that the results of recent “pollination” networks and webs, based on visitors but not necessarily pollinators, should be treated with caution. SVSPD therefore proved to be an effective and relatively simple direct measure of PE, confirming the predictive powers of pollination syndromes, and giving further insight into the extent of specialisation and generalisation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3219
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Biology Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)