Biology (School of) >
Biology Masters Theses >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Resolving ant-plant conflicts: mechanisms and functions of floral ant-repellence|
|Authors: ||Pattrick, Johnathan G.|
|Supervisors: ||Willmer, Pat|
|Issue Date: ||19-Jun-2012|
|Abstract: ||Although ants have numerous, often beneficial interactions with plants, as pollinators they are
poor. Potential reasons for this include restrictions resulting from their morphology and
specific foraging behaviours, and detrimental effects of their surface secretions on pollen.
This, coupled with other possible negative effects of ants on floral structures, puts pressure on
plants to exclude ants from flowers. One common strategy to achieve this is via behaviour-
modifying repellent floral volatiles; however, few studies have identified the volatiles
concerned. Here I considered two aspects of this interaction.
Firstly, I assessed seven temperate angiosperm species for floral repellence to Formica
aquilonia ants using a simple two-way olfactometer. In agreement with previous studies
showing that floral ant-repellence is common, significant repellent effects were found in 3/7
species. I also analysed the floral bouquet of Petasites fragrans, a plant previously shown to
possess ant-repellent floral volatiles. The most prominent volatile was identified as 4-
methoxybenzaldehyde and olfactometer testing of a pure sample of this confirmed it as the
likely source of floral repellence in P. fragrans. Although the natural interactions between P.
fragrans and ants are unknown, intriguingly 4-methoxybenzaldehyde has been detected from
floral volatiles of two further species with frequent ant interactions.
A second study compared effects of ants and bees on pollen function to explore the supposed
significance of ant-induced reductions in pollen viability. Lily pollen was exposed to either F.
aquilonia, Apis mellifera, or Bombus pascuorum, germinated in vitro and assessed for viability.
Small, marginally significant reductions in viability were identified for all three insects
compared to a control, but with no differences in the reduction between each insect.
Although this indicates that the pollen inviability hypothesis for the scarcity of ant pollination
may be incorrect, a comparative study with several pollinator and plant species is needed to
substantiate this conclusion.|
|Appears in Collections:||Biology Masters Theses|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.