Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Biology (School of) >
Biology >
Biology Masters Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3214
This item has been viewed 54 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
JonathanPattrickMPhilThesis.pdfThesis (Main text)9.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
JonathanPattrickMPhilThesisAppendix.pdfAppendix (Chapter 6)238.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Resolving ant-plant conflicts : mechanisms and functions of floral ant-repellence
Authors: Pattrick, Jonathan G.
Supervisors: Willmer, Pat
Issue Date: 19-Jun-2012
Abstract: Although ants have numerous, often beneficial interactions with plants, as pollinators they are poor. Potential reasons for this include restrictions resulting from their morphology and specific foraging behaviours, and detrimental effects of their surface secretions on pollen. This, coupled with other possible negative effects of ants on floral structures, puts pressure on plants to exclude ants from flowers. One common strategy to achieve this is via behaviour-modifying repellent floral volatiles; however, few studies have identified the volatiles concerned. Here I considered two aspects of this interaction. Firstly, I assessed seven temperate angiosperm species for floral repellence to Formica aquilonia ants using a simple two-way olfactometer. In agreement with previous studies showing that floral ant-repellence is common, significant repellent effects were found in 3/7 species. I also analysed the floral bouquet of Petasites fragrans, a plant previously shown to possess ant-repellent floral volatiles. The most prominent volatile was identified as 4-methoxybenzaldehyde and olfactometer testing of a pure sample of this confirmed it as the likely source of floral repellence in P. fragrans. Although the natural interactions between P. fragrans and ants are unknown, intriguingly 4-methoxybenzaldehyde has been detected from floral volatiles of two further species with frequent ant interactions. A second study compared effects of ants and bees on pollen function to explore the supposed significance of ant-induced reductions in pollen viability. Lily pollen was exposed to either F. aquilonia, Apis mellifera, or Bombus pascuorum, germinated in vitro and assessed for viability. Small, marginally significant reductions in viability were identified for all three insects compared to a control, but with no differences in the reduction between each insect. Although this indicates that the pollen inviability hypothesis for the scarcity of ant pollination may be incorrect, a comparative study with several pollinator and plant species is needed to substantiate this conclusion.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3214
Type: Thesis
Appears in Collections:Biology Masters Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)