Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Psychology & Neuroscience (School of) >
Psychology & Neuroscience >
Psychology & Neuroscience Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3152
This item has been viewed 4 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Thefulltextofthisdocumentisnotavailable-1.pdfPlaceholder document6.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Sex differences in anxiety during adolescence : evidence from rodents and humans
Authors: Lynn, Debra Alana
Supervisors: Brown, Gillian R.
Keywords: Adolescence
Anxiety
Rodent
Interpretive bias
Anxiety disorders
Elevated plus-maze
Open field
Locomotor box
Issue Date: 30-Nov-2012
Abstract: Anxiety disorders commonly emerge during adolescence, and girls are diagnosed with these disorders more frequently than boys. Understanding why anxiety disorders emerge and why non-clinical anxiety symptoms increase during adolescence is important for understanding this sex difference and how to treat adolescent sufferers. Potential mechanisms, such as puberty or cognitive biases, can be investigated both in humans and in rodent models of anxiety. This thesis aimed to characterise sex differences and changes in anxiety-like behaviour across adolescence and into adulthood in the rat, and to examine anxiety and interpretive bias in adolescent humans. In rats, we examined performance on common tests of anxiety-like behaviour: the emergence test, open field and elevated plus-maze. Exploration on these tests increased from mid-adolescence into adulthood, and greater exploration by females was apparent from late adolescence. While the behaviours themselves remain interesting, caution on interpreting these behaviours as anxiety-related warranted and is discussed throughout the thesis. Potential effects of the ovarian cycle and testing order on EPM performance were also examined. In humans, 12-14 year old adolescents complete visual and written interpretive bias tasks, this bias being considered to be a cognitive vulnerability for anxiety. The results showed that, when imagining themselves in ambiguous scenarios, girls were more negative in their interpretations than boys. Additionally, both sexes also interpreted social scenarios more negatively than non-social scenarios. As puberty is thought to be important to the emergence of disorder during adolescence, interpretive bias could potentially mediate the puberty-anxiety relationship. While more interpretive bias work is needed in both species, the recent development of interpretive bias tasks for rodents provides an opportunity to move away from difficult to interpret tests of anxiety-like behaviour in rodents, and should allow for greater convergence of the human and rodent anxiety research.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3152
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Psychology & Neuroscience Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)