Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Biology (School of) >
Biology >
Biology Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3139
This item has been viewed 27 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Thefulltextofthisdocumentisnotavailable.pdf4.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The function of roll in foraging behaviour of sperm whales
Authors: Hartvig, Eva Christel
Supervisors: Miller, Patrick
Issue Date: 2011
Abstract: Though direct experiments to test echolocation in sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) remain impossible, the indirect evidence is overwhelming that one function of their clicks is echolocation used during foraging, as has been shown for other toothed whales. In this thesis, the aim was to test: 1) the hypothesis by Fristrup and Harbison (2002) that the sperm whale might be using downwelling light during the day to spot prey or prey patches as silhouettes against the lighter sea surface. 2) A second hypothesis by Fristrup and Harbison (2002) suggested that the sperm whales use vision to look for bioluminescence in prey at depth, or during the night when no light is available. 3) Indications that the sperm whales changed their roll-behaviour, rolling more extensively when they were producing regular clicks during the descent as well as for the ascent. Data from 51 sperm whales tagged in the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean and northern Norway, were tested to explore how large a proportion of the bottom-interval the whales spent at angles where they were able to see towards the lighter sea surface at three different pitch-modes while either searching or buzzing, for each dive. The majority of whales were found to be swimming predominantly upside down or on the side during both the day and night time. The whales were not found to change the way they use roll at night compared to the day time, when looking at the bottom-interval when the whales were both searching for prey and buzzing. Looking at another function for roll and a possible association with the echolocation of the sperm whales, it was found that during the descent, the whales had a tendency to have a higher variance of roll when they were producing regular clicks. A very similar trend showed for the ascent-phase as well, that they seemed to roll more when clicking compared to when they were not, before they reached the sea surface. These analyses of the roll-behaviour of sperm whales used to test the hypotheses put forward by Fristrup and Harbison do not seem to support the use of vision to detect prey during foraging at depth, but might indicate that the sperm whale was intentionally changing its roll-behaviour, when they were producing regular clicks during the ascent and descent-phase in the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Norway.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3139
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Biology Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)