Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Divinity (School of) >
Divinity >
Divinity Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3019
This item has been viewed 38 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
JeffreySteelPhDThesis.pdfThesis text1.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Eucharist and ecumenism in the theology of Lancelot Andrewes (1555-1626) : then and now
Authors: Steel, Jeffrey
Supervisors: Brown, David
Keywords: Eucharist
Sacrifice
Andrewes
Ecumenism
Issue Date: 22-May-2012
Abstract: This thesis is an examination of Lancelot Andrewes’ (1555-1626) Eucharistic theology which is explored in order to see how far he might act as a catalyst for ecumenism with Rome on the topic of Eucharistic sacrifice. The purpose of the thesis is to develop a fuller exposition of Andrewes’ Eucharistic theology as a unique theologian who maintained a view of sacrifice that was denied by Protestants on the continent of Europe and by most within the English Church of his day. In the first four chapters Andrewes’ own views are not always juxtaposed to more contemporary views. This is intentional in order to develop his own thought before looking at him as an ecumenical partner on sacrifice. The first chapter explores Andrewes as a theologian within his own context of ecclesiology, placing Andrewes within a more Catholic framework as opposed to Puritanism that was becoming politically influential during the reign of King James I. The second chapter then looks at Andrewes’ view of Eucharistic instrumentality where I characterise him as an ‘effectual instrumentalist’ over against some contemporary scholars who place him alongside John Calvin who is sometimes described as a ‘symbolic instrumentalist’. I find Andrewes closer to a Catholic framework of instrumentalism. The third chapter further explores Andrewes’ view of presence where I conclude that he should be characterised as one holding to an objective view of presence and give him the Cappodocian label as a Transelementationist. This is to emphasise that Andrewes did encourage the faithful to look for Christ in the elements themselves, which goes beyond Christ’s presence within the faith of the believer alone. The fourth chapter is the lengthiest chapter as it develops Andrewes’ views of sacrifice. I see him as someone immersed in the sacrificial nature of the Eucharist defined within the writings of the Fathers of the first five centuries. It was here that Andrewes is able to be set fully within the framework of a Catholic view of the mystery as the Christian sacrifice offered to God in return for the gift of the Christ-event to the world. Andrewes’ description of the offering as containing a propitiatory effect in the application of the forgiveness of sins through ‘instrumental touching’ was a unique understanding of someone in the Church of England during the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. In the final chapter, I juxtapose Andrewes with Catholic teaching as it is explored in contemporary Catholic theology as well as, perhaps more importantly, within papal documents and authoritative Catholic statements on the sacrifice of the Mass. This is to show how similar Andrewes is in his description of the sacrifice of the Eucharist to Rome and how he goes further in that direction than any of his contemporaries or even modern ecumenical statements in Anglican and Roman Catholic dialogue.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3019
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Divinity Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)