Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2990
This item has been viewed 44 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2011_687R2_resubmission_15_12_11.pdf341.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry
Authors: Cook, J. A.
Botello, A. P.
Elders, A.
Ali, A. Fathi
Azuara-Blanco, A.
Fraser, C.
McCormack, K.
Burr, Jennifer Margaret
Group(), Surveillance of Ocular Hypertension Study
Keywords: RE Ophthalmology
Issue Date: Aug-2012
Citation: Cook , J A , Botello , A P , Elders , A , Ali , A F , Azuara-Blanco , A , Fraser , C , McCormack , K , Burr , J M & Group() , S O O H S 2012 , ' Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry ' Ophthalmology , vol 119 , no. 8 , pp. 1552-1557 .
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement of tonometers available for clinical practice with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the most commonly accepted reference device. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of directly comparative studies assessing the agreement of 1 or more tonometers with the reference tonometer (GAT). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11 582 participants (15 525 eyes) were included. METHODS: Summary 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were produced for each comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement, recordability, and reliability. RESULTS: A total of 102 studies, including 130 paired comparisons, were included, representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer, Ocuton S, handheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen. The agreement (95% limits) seemed to vary across tonometers: 0.2 mmHg (-3.8 to 4.3 mmHg) for the NCT to 2.7 mmHg (-4.1 to 9.6 mmHg) for the Ocuton S. The estimated proportion within 2 mmHg of the GAT ranged from 33% (Ocuton S) to 66% and 59% (NCT and HAT, respectively). Substantial inter- and intraobserver variability were observed for all tonometers. CONCLUSIONS: The NCT and HAT seem to achieve a measurement closest to the GAT. However, there was substantial variability in measurements both within and between studies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2990
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.030
ISSN: 0161-6420
Type: Journal article
Rights: This is the accepted version of an article published in Ophthalmology, © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology, available from http://www.sciencedirect.com
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Medicine Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)