Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2757
This item has been viewed 4 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
harris_german_preprint.pdf370.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Comparing motion induction in lateral motion and motion in depth
Authors: Harris, Julie
German, KJ
Keywords: Induced motion
Motion in depth
Binocular
Motion
Random-dot stereograms
Induced movement
Eye movements
Perception
Representation
Stereomotion
Velocity
Errors
BF Psychology
Issue Date: Feb-2008
Citation: Harris , J & German , K J 2008 , ' Comparing motion induction in lateral motion and motion in depth ' Vision Research , vol 48 , no. 5 , pp. 695-702 .
Abstract: Induced motion, the apparent motion of an object when a nearby object moves, has been shown to occur in a variety of different conditions, including motion in depth. Here we explore whether similar patterns of induced motion result from induction in a lateral direction (frontoparallel motion) or induction in depth. We measured the magnitude of induced motion in a stationary target for: (a) binocularly viewed lateral motion of a pair of inducers, where the angular motion is in the same direction for the two eyes, and (b) binocularly viewed motion in depth of inducers, where the angular motions in the two eyes are opposite to each other, but the same magnitude as for the lateral motion. We found that induced motion is of similar magnitude for the two viewing conditions. This suggests a common mechanism for motion induction by both lateral motion and motion in depth, and is consistent with the idea that the visual signals responsible for induced motion are established before angular information is scaled to obtain metric motion in depth.
Version: Preprint
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2757
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.018
ISSN: 0042-6989
Type: Journal article
Rights: This is an author version of this work. Published version (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd is available from http://www.sciencedirect.com
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Psychology & Neuroscience Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)