Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2597
This item has been viewed 273 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Sjoberg_and_Gentry_2008_Profiling_Terror.pdf244.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Profiling terror : gender, strategic logic, and emotion in the study of suicide terrorism
Authors: Gentry, Caron Eileen
Sjoberg, Laura
Keywords: Gender
Terrorism
Rational actor
Feminism
JZ International relations
Issue Date: 2008
Citation: Gentry , C E & Sjoberg , L 2008 , ' Profiling terror : gender, strategic logic, and emotion in the study of suicide terrorism ' Austrian Journal of Political Science , vol 2008 , no. 2 , pp. 181-196 .
Abstract: Robert Pape's well-received book, Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (2005), presents what appears to be a gender-neutral study of both male and female suicide terrorists. Pape's main argument is that suicide terrorism is a strategic and rational terror campaign against democracies. While the study argues that male and female suicide terrorists are rational individuals, it depicts women as motivated by emotion. Thus, this article argues that gender-neutral work is rarely gender-neutral and such studies fail to recognize the social and political impact of gender. Furthermore, we argue that the rational choice model presented by Pape furthers the gender divide by emphasizing values associated with masculinity over values associated with femininity. As an alternative, we propose three propositions to change the study of suicide terrorism to include both political and emotional motivations. We propose that gendered presentations of female suicide bombers reify stereotypical images of gender and of suicide bombers, that silence about the complexity of suicide bombers' motivations does not erase the many variables that go into martyrs' decisions, and that adding emotion to the study of suicide bombing counterbalances the narrowness of the "strategic actor" model. The essay concludes with evidence from the study of the Chechen "black widows" that demonstrates the explanatory value of these propositions.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2597
http://www.oezp.at/getMagazine.php?id=55
ISSN: 1615-5548
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c) 2008 Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (ÖGPW, Austrian Political Science Association)
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
International Relations Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)