Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2320
This item has been viewed 2 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
BMCNeuroscience2008_9_16.pdf961.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis : Do both have a role in sustained attention?
Authors: Rostron, Claire L.
Farquhar, Morag J.
Latimer, Mary P.
Winn, Philip
Keywords: Lateral geniculate-nucleus
Reaction-time-task-TASK
Cholinergic modulation
Excitotoxic lesions
NADPH-diaphorase
Visual-attention
Rat
Forebrain
Performance
Thalmus
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Issue Date: 30-Jan-2008
Citation: Rostron , C L , Farquhar , M J , Latimer , M P & Winn , P 2008 , ' The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis : Do both have a role in sustained attention? ' BioMed Central Neuroscience , vol 9 , 16 .
Abstract: Background: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. Results: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. Conclusion: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss.
Version: Publisher PDF
Description: Additional 'open data' files can be found on the publisher's site at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/16
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2320
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16
ISSN: 1471-2202
Type: Journal article
Rights: © 2008 Rostron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Psychology & Neuroscience Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)