Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
History (School of) >
Modern History >
Modern History Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2082
This item has been viewed 194 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
DanielRondagsMPhilThesis.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Martin Broszat, Saul Friedländer and the historicisation of the Third Reich
Authors: Rondags, Daniël
Supervisors: Bavaj, Riccardo
Keywords: Martin Broszat
Saul Friedländer
Historicisation
Historicization
Third Reich
World War II
Historiography
Intellectual biography
Issue Date: 30-Nov-2011
Abstract: In 1987, Martin Broszat (1926-1989) and Saul Friedländer (born 1932) debated the concept of “historicisation” in an exchange of letters. These letters were first published in the German premier journal Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte (Quarterly for Contemporary History) and were eventually reproduced in other publications and translated into English. Today, the exchange between Broszat and Friedländer is viewed as one of the classic controversies in the historiography of the Third Reich and the Holocaust and is occasionally referred to as the “historicisation debate.” This thesis offers a historiographical analysis of the works of both Martin Broszat and Saul Friedländer. The central aim of this thesis is to identify, contextualise and examine the major themes of the historicisation debate. The first chapter provides an introduction to, and a close reading of, the letter exchange and further identifies the three major themes that structure the following three chapters: identity; history, memory and narrative construction; and the centrality of the Holocaust in the Nazi past. Each of these three chapters is divided into two sections: the first half is devoted to Broszat, the second half to Friedländer. The conclusion offers a comparison between their historiographical positions.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2082
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Modern History Theses



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)