Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Medicine (School of) >
Medicine >
Medicine Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1817
This item has been viewed 40 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
GHSharwoodSmithCoverSheet1.pdf96.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia: spinal anaesthesia is the preferred choice
Authors: Sharwood-Smith, Geoffrey H.
Clark, V.
Watson, E.
Keywords: Caesarean section
Spinal anaesthesia
Preeclampsia
Hypotension
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Issue Date: Apr-1999
Citation: Sharwood-Smith, G., Clark, V. and Watson, E. 1999. Regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia: spinal anaesthesia is the preferred choice. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 8(2): 85-89
Abstract: Standard textbooks advocate epidural rather than spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia. The basis for this recommendation is the theoretical risk of severe hypotension but no published scientific studies have been identified to support this assertion. We therefore designed a prospective study to compare spinal versus epidural anaesthesia in severely pre-eclamptic patients requiring hypotensive therapy. Following ethics committee approval, 28 women with preeclampsia requiring hypotensive medication who were scheduled for urgent (not emergency) or elective caesarean section consented to receive epidural or spinal anaesthesia by random assignment. Seven patients were excluded due to protocol violations. Four of these were in the epidural group of which two were excluded due to inadequate analgesia. No spinal patient was excluded because of inadequate analgesia. Mean ephedrine dosage was 5.2 mg (range 0–24 mg) in the spinal group and 6.3 mg (range 0–27 mg) in the epidural group. Six of the 11 patients in the spinal group required no ephedrine as did five of 10 in the epidural group. One patient in the spinal group suffered from mild intraoperative pain. By contrast in the epidural group three patients had mild pain and four others had pain severe enough to warrant intraoperative analgesia. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. These findings support recent studies suggesting the safety and efficacy of spinal anaesthesia in this group of patients.
Version: Publisher PDF
Description: Part of the Portfolio Thesis by Geoffrey H. Sharwood-Smith: The inferior vena caval compression theory of hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: studies in normal and preeclamptic pregnancy, a literature review and revision of fundamental concepts, available at http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1815
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1815
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1817
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-289X(99)80003-X
ISSN: 0959-289X
Type: Journal article
Rights: Copyright (c)1999 Elsevier Ltd. Deposited as part of portfolio thesis by permission of the publisher.
Publication Status: Published
Status: Peer reviewed
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Appears in Collections:Medicine Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)