|
|
Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1648
| Title: | Developing hypnotic analogues of clinical delusions : Mirrored-self misidentification |
| Authors: | Barnier, Amanda Cox, Rochelle O'Connor, Akira Robert Coltheart, Max Langdon, Robyn Breen, Nora Turner, Martha |
| Keywords: | Delusion Hypnosis Cognitive Neuropsychology Mirrored Self-Identification Hypnotic Analogues |
| Issue Date: | Sep-2008 |
| Citation: | Barnier , A , Cox , R , O'Connor , A R , Coltheart , M , Langdon , R , Breen , N & Turner , M 2008 , ' Developing hypnotic analogues of clinical delusions : Mirrored-self misidentification ' Cognitive Neuropsychiatry , vol 13 , no. 5 , pp. 406-430 . |
| Abstract: | Introduction. Despite current research interest in delusional beliefs, there are no viable models for studying delusions in the laboratory. However, hypnosis offers a technique for creating transient delusions that are resistant to challenge. The aim of this study was to develop an hypnotic analogue of one important delusion, mirrored-self misidentification. Methods. Twelve high hypnotisable participants received an hypnotic suggestion to see either a stranger in the mirror, a mirror as a window, or a mirror as a window with a view to a stranger. Participants' deluded beliefs were challenged, and following hypnosis, Sheehan and McConkey's (1982) Experiential Analysis Technique was used to explore participants' phenomenological experience of the delusion. Results. The majority of participants did not recognise their reflection in the mirror, described the person in the mirror as having different physical characteristics to themselves, and maintained their delusion when challenged. Conclusions. The hypnotic suggestion created a credible, compelling delusion with features strikingly similar to clinical cases of mirrored-self misidentification. Our findings suggest that Factor 2 within Langdon and Coltheart's (2000) two-factor framework may involve a lowering of the criteria used to accept or reject delusional hypotheses. |
| Version: | Postprint |
| Status: | Peer reviewed |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1648 |
| DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546800802355666 |
| ISSN: | 1354-6805 |
| Type: | Journal article |
| Rights: | This is an electronic version of an article published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 13(5), available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1354-6805&volume=13&issue=5&spage=406 |
| Appears in Collections: | University of St Andrews Research Psychology & Neuroscience Research
|
This item is protected by original copyright
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|