Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1629
This item has been viewed 160 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fazey2006EnvironmentalConservation33ExperientialKnowledge.pdf128.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation
Authors: Fazey, Ioan Raymond Albert
Fazey, John A.
Salisbury, Janet G.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Dovers, Steve
Keywords: Evidence-based conservation
Experience
Indigenous knowledge
Tacit knowledge
Traditional ecological knowledge
Expert opinion
Management
Science
Perceptions
Resilience
Medicine
Models
BF Psychology
QH Natural history
Issue Date: Mar-2006
Citation: Fazey , I R A , Fazey , J A , Salisbury , J G , Lindenmayer , D B & Dovers , S 2006 , ' The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation ' Environmental Conservation , vol 33 , no. 1 , pp. 110 .
Abstract: Understanding the nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation is a necessary step towards understanding if it should be used and how it might be applied with other types of knowledge in an evidence-based approach. This paper describes the nature of experiential and expert knowledge. It then discusses the role of experiential knowledge as a complement to scientific knowledge and explains the interplay between experiential knowledge with conservation research and practice using a simple conceptual model of how individuals learn. There are five main conclusions: (1) because experiential knowledge will always play a role in decision-making, enhancing ability to learn from experiences (including research) will have a significant influence on the effectiveness of conservation outcomes; (2) while experiential knowledge is qualitatively very different from quantitative information, both are important and complementary; (3) some experiential knowledge can be expressed quantitatively, but experiential knowledge can be difficult to isolate as single facts or propositions and qualitative methods will therefore often be required to elicit experiential knowledge; (4) because each person's expertise is unique, when using experiential knowledge the extent of a person's experience and its relevance to a particular problem need to be specified; and (5) as with any form of knowledge, there are limitations to that derived from personal experience. Synthesis and communication of research is therefore essential to help prevent erroneous thinking and, where possible, experiential knowledge should be used in conjunction with other types of information to guide conservation actions.
Version: Publisher PDF
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1629
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689290600275X
ISSN: 0376-8929
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c)2006 Foundation for Environmental Conservation
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Scottish Oceans Institute Research
Geography & Sustainable Development Research
Geography & Geosciences Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)