Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1362
This item has been viewed 19 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
McKee2009-LE-Empowering.pdf53.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Empowering Glasgow’s tenants through community ownership?
Authors: McKee, Kim
Keywords: Community participation
Devolution
Housing stock transfer
Neighbourhood governance
Regeneration
HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Issue Date: Jun-2009
Citation: McKee , K 2009 , ' Empowering Glasgow’s tenants through community ownership? ' Local Economy , vol 24 , no. 4 , pp. 299-309 .
Abstract: Post 1997, stock transfer has been pivotal to the housing and regeneration agenda of the New Labour government, both at the UK and devolved level. Although a heavily researched policy area, stock transfer research has tended to focus quite narrowly on the perspectives of policymakers, practitioners or members of the transfer association's governing body. To address this research gap and focus more explicitly on the voices of local residents, this paper draws on the case study of the unique two-stage Glasgow housing stock transfer in order to explore 'community ownership' and 'tenant empowerment' from the perspective of 'lay' tenants. Political ambitions for direct democracy and communitarian endeavour have been central to stock transfer agendas in Scotland, where the policy has developed quite distinctly compared with the rest of the UK. Focus group research with tenants in Glasgow, however, highlights that empowerment was not an important priority for tenants at the point of transfer; that the transfer has delivered mixed outcomes in terms of local tenant control; and on the key issue of support for 'full' community ownership tenants were unconvinced, and expressed a need for more information.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1362
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02690940903026829
ISSN: 0269-0942
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c)2009 Taylor and Francis. This is an electronic version of an article published in Local Economy, available from DOI:10.1080/02690940903026829
Appears in Collections:Geography & Sustainable Development Research
University of St Andrews Research
Geography & Geosciences Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)