Research@StAndrews
 
The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1337
This item has been viewed 26 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
McKee-EurJnlHousingPolicy7-CommunityOwnership.pdf82.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Community ownership in Glasgow : the devolution of ownership and control, or a centralizing process?
Authors: McKee, Kim
Keywords: Social rented housing
Stock transfer
Community ownership
Tenant empowerment
Second stage transfer
Glasgow
HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Issue Date: Sep-2007
Citation: McKee , K 2007 , ' Community ownership in Glasgow : the devolution of ownership and control, or a centralizing process? ' European Journal of Housing Policy , vol 7 , no. 3 , pp. 319-336 .
Abstract: The largest housing stock transfer in Europe, the 2003 Glasgow transfer, promises to 'empower' tenants by devolving ownership and control from the state to local communities. This is to be delivered through a devolved structure in which day to day housing management is delegated to a citywide network of 60 Local Housing Organizations, governed at the neighbourhood level by committees of local residents. The receiving landlord, the Glasgow Housing Association, has further made commitments to disaggregate the organization via Second Stage Transfer in order to facilitate local community ownership, as well as management of the housing stock. This paper argues that while the Glasgow transfer has enhanced local control in the decision-making process within the limits permitted by the transfer framework, it has nonetheless failed to deliver the levels of involvement aspired to by those actively engaged in the process. Displaying, at times, more of the semblance of a movement than an organization, the Glasgow Housing Association operates a classic centre-periphery divide. These tense central-local relations have contributed to the emergence of conflict which has further undermined negotiations surrounding the realization of full community ownership via Second Stage Transfer.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1337
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616710701477946
ISSN: 1461-6718
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c)2007 Taylor and Francis. This is an author version of an article published in European Journal of Housing Policy, available online at DOI: 10.1080/14616710701477946
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Geography & Geosciences Research
Geography & Sustainable Development Research



This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)