Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGlennie, Richard
dc.contributor.authorBuckland, Stephen Terrence
dc.contributor.authorLangrock, Roland
dc.contributor.authorGerrodette, Tim
dc.contributor.authorBallance, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorChivers, Susan
dc.contributor.authorScott, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-29T10:32:46Z
dc.date.available2017-09-29T10:32:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-08
dc.identifier251041173
dc.identifiera90fbe19-9087-4e78-ace9-4256ff1131e5
dc.identifier85087021625
dc.identifier000543136200001
dc.identifier.citationGlennie , R , Buckland , S T , Langrock , R , Gerrodette , T , Ballance , L , Chivers , S & Scott , M 2020 , ' Incorporating animal movement into distance sampling ' , Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol. Latest Articles , pp. 1-9 . https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1764362en
dc.identifier.issn0162-1459
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9939-709X/work/78204874
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3806-4280/work/78205054
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11757
dc.descriptionR. Glennie gratefully acknowledges the Carnegie Trust for funding his work on this research project.en
dc.description.abstractDistance sampling is a popular statistical method to estimate the density of wild animal populations. Conventional distance sampling represents animals as fixed points in space that are detected with an unknown probability that depends on the distance between the observer and the animal. Animal movement can cause substantial bias in density estimation. Methods to correct for responsive animal movement exist, but none account for nonresponsive movement independent of the observer. Here, an explicit animal movement model is incorporated into distance sampling, combining distance sampling survey data with animal telemetry data. Detection probability depends on the entire unobserved path the animal travels. The intractable integration over all possible animal paths is approximated by a hidden Markov model. A simulation study shows the method to be negligibly biased (<5%) in scenarios where conventional distance sampling overestimates abundance by up to 100%. The method is applied to line transect surveys (1999–2006) of spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata) in the eastern tropical Pacific where abundance is shown to be positively biased by 21% on average, which can have substantial impact on the population dynamics estimated from these abundance estimates and on the choice of statistical methodology applied to future surveys
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent324458
dc.format.extent954937
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Statistical Associationen
dc.subjectAbundanceen
dc.subjectContinuous-timeen
dc.subjectDiffusionen
dc.subjectHidden Markov modelen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectIen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleIncorporating animal movement into distance samplingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01621459.2020.1764362
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-06-08


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record