<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10023/121</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:32:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T20:32:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Towards moral and authentic generalization : humanity, individual human beings and distortion</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3336</link>
      <description>Abstract: The article treats the issue of generality. How may one conceive of the relationship between the uniqueness of individuality and the commonality of the human (species and society) without reduction? Can generalization be made moral – es-chewing stereotypes in society – and can it be made authentic – enacting a human science which treats the individual as a thing-in-itself? Simmel’s seminal inter-vention was to see generality as a necessary kind of distortion. In contrast, this article offers rational models of the one and the whole which expect to retain the uniqueness of the one; and it suggests characteristics of human embodiment (ca-pacities, potentialities) that speak to individuality and generality at the same time. The article ends with a reconsideration of distortion as a humane artistic represen-tation, by way of the work of Stanley Spencer.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3336</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Rapport, Nigel Julian</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>The article treats the issue of generality. How may one conceive of the relationship between the uniqueness of individuality and the commonality of the human (species and society) without reduction? Can generalization be made moral – es-chewing stereotypes in society – and can it be made authentic – enacting a human science which treats the individual as a thing-in-itself? Simmel’s seminal inter-vention was to see generality as a necessary kind of distortion. In contrast, this article offers rational models of the one and the whole which expect to retain the uniqueness of the one; and it suggests characteristics of human embodiment (ca-pacities, potentialities) that speak to individuality and generality at the same time. The article ends with a reconsideration of distortion as a humane artistic represen-tation, by way of the work of Stanley Spencer.</dc:description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gypsy/Roma diasporas. A comparative perspective</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1508</link>
      <description>Abstract: In this article I explore the imaginative and practical links that the Gitanos of Jarana, in Madrid, make with other Gitanos and Gypsies elsewhere. What kind of diaspora do they see themselves as belonging to? The context to my investigation is the fast growth of both Gypsy Pentecostalism and Roma international political activism – two movements that, in very different ways, call for the unity of all Gypsies/Roma worldwide. Their efforts contrast greatly with the world-views and attitudes of many of the people of Jarana who reject social harmony and cohesion as paths to community-making.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1508</guid>
      <dc:date>2002-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Gay y Blasco, Paloma</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>In this article I explore the imaginative and practical links that the Gitanos of Jarana, in Madrid, make with other Gitanos and Gypsies elsewhere. What kind of diaspora do they see themselves as belonging to? The context to my investigation is the fast growth of both Gypsy Pentecostalism and Roma international political activism – two movements that, in very different ways, call for the unity of all Gypsies/Roma worldwide. Their efforts contrast greatly with the world-views and attitudes of many of the people of Jarana who reject social harmony and cohesion as paths to community-making.</dc:description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

