2024-03-28T19:41:26Zhttps://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/oai/requestoai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/173022024-02-25T00:42:53Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
Russell, Shona
University of St Andrews. School of Management
University of St Andrews. Centre for the Study of Philanthropy & Public Good
2019-03-18T00:38:10Z
2019-03-18T00:38:10Z
2017-09-18
2019-03-18
250674950
821cbb5e-6e9f-42a7-add9-0a26074c859c
Russell , S 2017 , ' Potential users’ perceptions of general purpose water accounting reports. ' , Social and Environmental Accountability Journal , vol. 37 , no. 3 , pp. 227-228 . https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1376912
0969-160X
ORCID: /0000-0002-3473-5019/work/41192209
https://hdl.handle.net/10023/17302
10.1080/0969160X.2017.1376912
33483
eng
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
water
accounting
sustainability
HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences (General)
SDG 15 - Life on Land
HD
H1
Potential users’ perceptions of general purpose water accounting reports.
Journal item
Peer reviewed
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/117702023-04-25T23:46:46Zcom_10023_1949com_10023_39com_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_1950col_10023_90col_10023_880
Mulder, Machiel
Scholtens, Bert
University of St Andrews. School of Management
University of St Andrews. Centre for Responsible Banking and Finance
2017-09-30T23:38:24Z
2017-09-30T23:38:24Z
2016-12-01
2017-09-30
Mulder , M & Scholtens , B 2016 , ' A plant-level analysis of the spill-over effects of the German Energiewende ' , Applied Energy , vol. 183 , pp. 1259-1271 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.056
0306-2619
PURE: 246457720
PURE UUID: d3b72e97-000e-47d5-a081-7fb80cf7dbdc
RIS: urn:43992A125A22629F51893B556D42ADCA
Scopus: 84989196110
ORCID: /0000-0001-5774-5191/work/27162425
WOS: 000395726400030
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11770
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.056
In order to analyse international effects of national energy policies, we investigate the spill-over effects of the German Energiewende on the Dutch power market, which is closely connected to the German market. We estimate the impact of the German supply of wind and solar electricity on the Dutch day-ahead price of electricity and the utilisation of the conventional power plants. We take cross-border capacity constraints into account and use hourly plant-level data over 2006–2014. We find that the price elasticity of German wind on Dutch day-ahead prices is −0.03. However, this effect vanishes when the cross-border capacity is fully utilised. We find a modest negative impact on the utilisation of the Dutch power plants. As such, we conclude that the German Energiewende has had modest spill-over effects to the Dutch market. The recent dramatic performance of the Dutch gas-fired plants can be attributed to the changes in the relative prices of coal versus natural gas. We conclude that national energy policies in one country do not necessarily strongly affect neighbouring markets in case of constrained cross-border capacities.
Postprint
Peer reviewed
13
eng
Applied Energy
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. This work is made available online in accordance with publisher's policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.056
Energy transition
Energiewende
Renewable energy
Fuel efficiency
Cross-border spill-overs
Transport capacity
HD Industries. Land use. Labor
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 15 - Life on Land
HD
A plant-level analysis of the spill-over effects of the German Energiewende
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/156002023-04-18T23:48:33Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
Wright, April
Middleton, Stuart
Hibbert, Paul Charles
Brazil, Victoria
University of St Andrews. School of Management
University of St Andrews. Office of the Principal
2018-07-19T15:30:04Z
2018-07-19T15:30:04Z
2018-07-15
2018-07-15
Wright , A , Middleton , S , Hibbert , P C & Brazil , V 2018 , ' Getting on with field research using participant deconstruction ' , Organizational Research Methods , vol. OnlineFirst . https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118782589
1094-4281
PURE: 253160019
PURE UUID: 3e183200-d54d-4bd2-a263-95bae9173c05
Scopus: 85049953161
ORCID: /0000-0002-2691-2556/work/64239354
WOS: 000516860500003
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/15600
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118782589
We acknowledge the support of the Australian Research Council in providing funding for this project under Linkage Project grant LP0989662 and Discovery Project grant DP140103237.
This paper adds to the repertoire of field research methods through developing the technique of ‘participant deconstruction’. This technique involves research participants challenging and re-interpreting organizational texts through the application of orienting, disorienting and re-orienting deconstructive questions. We show how participant deconstruction complements existing strategies for ‘getting on’ with field research – cultivating relationships, developing outsider knowledge and mobilising insider knowledge – by facilitating research participants’ questioning and challenging of organizational texts and thus opening up alternative latent understandings, illuminating concealed meanings and supporting reflexivity for participants and researchers, thereby opening up fruitful lines of inquiry. We illustrate the application of the technique with examples drawn from healthcare research projects. Through gathering further practitioner feedback from a variety of alternative contexts, we go on to demonstrate the potential application of participant deconstruction in a range of field contexts, by different types of practitioners undertaking deconstructive readings of a wide variety of organizational texts. We also offer suggestions for further research to extend the technique.
Postprint
Peer reviewed
eng
Organizational Research Methods
Copyright © 2018, SAGE Publications. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118782589
Qualitative Research
Deconstruction
Healthcare management
Field research
Research relationships
Texts
HD28 Management. Industrial Management
T-NDAS
HD28
Getting on with field research using participant deconstruction
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/42012023-01-22T12:30:09Zcom_10023_58com_10023_19com_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_59col_10023_90col_10023_880
Ajinomoh, Olatokunbo
Miller, Alan Henry David
Dow, Lisa
Gordon-Gibson, Alasdair Norman Stewart
Burt, Eleanor
Helfert, Markus
Martins, Maria Joao
Cordeiro, Jose
University of St Andrews. School of Computer Science
University of St Andrews. School of Management
2013-11-14T13:01:03Z
2013-11-14T13:01:03Z
2012
Ajinomoh , O , Miller , A H D , Dow , L , Gordon-Gibson , A N S & Burt , E 2012 , Managing humanitarian emergencies : Teaching and learning with a virtual humanitarian disaster tool . in M Helfert , M J Martins & J Cordeiro (eds) , CSEDU 2012 : Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education . vol. 1 , SciTePress , pp. 55-64 .
978-989-8565-06-8
PURE: 17953641
PURE UUID: b1e57fb9-c53d-4ebb-9ece-70a8ce5642c9
Scopus: 84864873401
ORCID: /0000-0002-8128-7538/work/36074097
ORCID: /0000-0002-3154-951X/work/82788637
ORCID: /0000-0003-1209-9063/work/40546706
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/4201
The project received start-up funding in the form of a University of St Andrews FILTA award
The importance of specialist intervention in the form of humanitarian aid from governments, NGOs and other aid agencies during a humanitarian emergency cannot be over-emphasised. Humanitarian aid is the assistance provided in response to a humanitarian crisis. Humanitarian aid may be logistical, financial or material and its central aim is to alleviate human suffering and save lives. This paper describes an inter-disciplinary project that created the Virtual Humanitarian Disaster learning and teaching resource (VHD) that is centred on the events occurring in the aftermath of an earthquake. To facilitate learning, scenarios with integrated task dilemmas have been modelled which will provide the opportunity for users of the resource to explore the inter-relationships between the key areas of activities which are important to the NGOs and other bodies which deliver humanitarian aid. Such areas include geo-political relationships, legal and regulatory requirements, information management, logistic, financial and human resource management imperatives. The VHD is primarily aimed at students. It creates a more flexible learning and teaching environment when compared with traditional classroom methods. The resource enables students to make decisions concerning critical situations within the controlled environment of a virtual world, where the consequences of any wrong decisions, will not directly impact on lives and property. The VHD has been embedded within an undergraduate module of the School of Management as it specifically relates to the final thematic area within which the module engages, namely the strategic and operational challenges faced by NGOs operating in the “humanitarian relief industry”. We demonstrate that virtual worlds can be used to enhance learning and make it more engaging. The VHD affords students the opportunity to explore given scenarios in accordance with a specified budget and in so doing, they realise module outcomes in a more active and authentic learning environment.
Postprint
eng
SciTePress
CSEDU 2012
Virtual Worlds
Humanitarian Emergencies
Collaborative Learning
Scenario-Based Training
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
QA75
HV
Managing humanitarian emergencies : Teaching and learning with a virtual humanitarian disaster tool
Conference item
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/138702023-04-25T23:47:20Zcom_10023_1949com_10023_39com_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_1950col_10023_90col_10023_880
Werner, Lone
Scholtens, Lambertus Johannes Regnerus
University of St Andrews. School of Management
University of St Andrews. Centre for Responsible Banking and Finance
2018-06-10T23:37:54Z
2018-06-10T23:37:54Z
2017-04-19
2018-06-10
Werner , L & Scholtens , L J R 2017 , ' Firm type, feed-in tariff, and wind energy investment in Germany : An investigation of decision making factors of energy producers regarding investing in wind energy capacity ' , Journal of Industrial Ecology , vol. 21 , no. 2 , pp. 402-411 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12443
1530-9290
PURE: 248065152
PURE UUID: 0b3cde66-4214-4c42-ac0e-9c46225432b2
Scopus: 84978712148
ORCID: /0000-0001-5774-5191/work/69835033
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13870
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12443
The development of renewable and sustainable energy is advanced by public financial support. Particularly so in the German Energiewende, which seeks to replace nuclear and fossil electricity generation with wind, sun, and biomass. We study the impact of the (changes in the) feed-in tariff policy on the investment in wind electricity generation capacity in Germany in the period 2000-2014. We estimate a generic investment model which includes this support mechanism, the cost of capital, investment risks like wind and price volatility, and manufacturing costs. We discuss specific features for different types of wind energy investors, such as the incumbents, small private investors, diversified companies, and independent power producers. We find that a change in the feed-in tariff has a negative impact on investment capacity regarding the generation of wind energy: a one monetary unit increase in the variation of the tariff is to be associated with a decrease by 0.17 MW wind capacity installed. We argue it is policy uncertainty that makes investors shy away from making real investments. We also argue that the drivers for wind energy investment can differ along different types of firms. For the traditional power producers, especially electricity price volatility, construction costs, and carbon prices seem to matter. But for the other investor types, the feed-in tariff is crucial indeed.
Postprint
Peer reviewed
10
eng
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Copyright © 2016, by Yale University. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12443
Feed-in tariff
Firm type
Germany
Industrial ecology
Investment
Wind energy
HD Industries. Land use. Labor
HG Finance
NDAS
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 15 - Life on Land
HD
HG
Firm type, feed-in tariff, and wind energy investment in Germany : An investigation of decision making factors of energy producers regarding investing in wind energy capacity
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/171942024-02-15T00:48:56Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
ASPIRE programme team
University of St Andrews. School of Management
2019-03-01T15:30:21Z
2019-03-01T15:30:21Z
2018-02-17
257964658
c7aaf3d9-437d-4d81-910e-5d48cefc7166
85042063164
29452582
ASPIRE programme team 2018 , ' To what extent can behaviour change techniques be identified within an adaptable implementation package for primary care? A prospective directed content analysis ' , Implementation Science , vol. 13 , no. 1 , 32 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0704-7
1748-5908
ORCID: /0000-0001-8684-0403/work/64361447
https://hdl.handle.net/10023/17194
10.1186/s13012-017-0704-7
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042063164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
Background: Interpreting evaluations of complex interventions can be difficult without sufficient description of key intervention content. We aimed to develop an implementation package for primary care which could be delivered using typically available resources and could be adapted to target determinants of behaviour for each of four quality indicators: diabetes control, blood pressure control, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and risky prescribing. We describe the development and prospective verification of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) embedded within the adaptable implementation packages. Methods: We used an over-lapping multi-staged process. We identified evidence-based, candidate delivery mechanisms-mainly audit and feedback, educational outreach and computerised prompts and reminders. We drew upon interviews with primary care professionals using the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore likely determinants of adherence to quality indicators. We linked determinants to candidate BCTs. With input from stakeholder panels, we prioritised likely determinants and intervention content prior to piloting the implementation packages. Our content analysis assessed the extent to which embedded BCTs could be identified within the packages and compared them across the delivery mechanisms and four quality indicators. Results: Each implementation package included at least 27 out of 30 potentially applicable BCTs representing 15 of 16 BCT categories. Whilst 23 BCTs were shared across all four implementation packages (e.g. BCTs relating to feedback and comparing behaviour), some BCTs were unique to certain delivery mechanisms (e.g. 'graded tasks' and 'problem solving' for educational outreach). BCTs addressing the determinants 'environmental context' and 'social and professional roles' (e.g. 'restructuring the social and 'physical environment' and 'adding objects to the environment') were indicator specific. We found it challenging to operationalise BCTs targeting 'environmental context', 'social influences' and 'social and professional roles' within our chosen delivery mechanisms. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a transparent process for selecting, operationalising and verifying the BCT content in implementation packages adapted to target four quality indicators in primary care. There was considerable overlap in BCTs identified across the four indicators suggesting core BCTs can be embedded and verified within delivery mechanisms commonly available to primary care. Whilst feedback reports can include a wide range of BCTs, computerised prompts can deliver BCTs at the time of decision making, and educational outreach can allow for flexibility and individual tailoring in delivery.
Peer reviewed
1005256
eng
Implementation Science
Audit and feedback
Behaviour change techniques
Clinical reminders
Computerised prompts
Discriminant content analysis
Educational outreach
Implementation intervention
Theoretical Domains Framework
RA Public aspects of medicine
Health Policy
Health Informatics
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
T-NDAS
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
RA
To what extent can behaviour change techniques be identified within an adaptable implementation package for primary care? A prospective directed content analysis
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/134842023-04-25T23:53:19Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
Ruppertsberg, Alexa I.
Ward, Vicky
Ridout, Alicia
Foy, Robbie
University of St Andrews. School of Management
2018-05-23T09:30:14Z
2018-05-23T09:30:14Z
2014-07-14
Ruppertsberg , A I , Ward , V , Ridout , A & Foy , R 2014 , ' The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications ' , Implementation Science , vol. 9 , no. 1 , 93 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0
1748-5908
PURE: 253148467
PURE UUID: ebcd2288-7320-4d72-a4cb-78c7505611c1
Scopus: 84904080190
PubMed: 25017548
ORCID: /0000-0001-8684-0403/work/64361448
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13484
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0
Background: Research funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals. Drawing upon existing frameworks, we developed audit criteria to help researchers and their institutions assess the knowledge exchange plans of health research proposals. Findings: Criteria clustered around five themes: problem definition; involvement of research users; public and patient engagement; dissemination and implementation; and planning, management and evaluation of knowledge exchange. We applied these to a sample of grant applications from one research institution in the United Kingdom to demonstrate feasibility. Conclusion: Our criteria may be useful as a tool for researcher self-assessment and for research institutions to assess the quality of knowledge exchange plans and identify areas for systematic improvement.
Publisher PDF
Peer reviewed
6
eng
Implementation Science
© 2014 Ruppertsberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Impact plans
Knowledge exchange
Research proposals
RA Public aspects of medicine
HD28 Management. Industrial Management
ZA Information resources
Z665 Library Science. Information Science
Health Policy
Health Informatics
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
RA
HD28
ZA
Z665
The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/134652023-04-25T23:53:18Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
Willis, Thomas A
Hartley, Suzanne
Glidewell, Liz
Farrin, Amanda J
Lawton, Rebecca
McEachan, Rosemary R C
Ingleson, Emma
Heudtlass, Peter
Collinson, Michelle
Clamp, Susan
Hunter, Cheryl
Ward, Vicky
Hulme, Claire
Meads, David
Bregantini, Daniele
Carder, Paul
Foy, Robbie
ASPIRE programme
University of St Andrews. School of Management
2018-05-22T14:30:07Z
2018-05-22T14:30:07Z
2016-02-29
Willis , T A , Hartley , S , Glidewell , L , Farrin , A J , Lawton , R , McEachan , R R C , Ingleson , E , Heudtlass , P , Collinson , M , Clamp , S , Hunter , C , Ward , V , Hulme , C , Meads , D , Bregantini , D , Carder , P , Foy , R & ASPIRE programme 2016 , ' Action to Support Practices Implement Research Evidence (ASPIRE) : protocol for a cluster-randomised evaluation of adaptable implementation packages targeting 'high impact' clinical practice recommendations in general practice ' , Implementation Science , vol. 11 , 25 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0387-5
1748-5908
PURE: 253148275
PURE UUID: 22ae8ffc-1cff-4e6e-9173-5ebf474f46d1
PubMed: 26923369
PubMedCentral: PMC4770678
Scopus: 84959350379
ORCID: /0000-0001-8684-0403/work/64361454
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13465
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0387-5
This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (grant Reference Number RP-PG-1209-10040).
BACKGROUND: There are recognised gaps between evidence and practice in general practice, a setting which provides particular challenges for implementation. We earlier screened clinical guideline recommendations to derive a set of 'high impact' indicators based upon criteria including potential for significant patient benefit, scope for improved practice and amenability to measurement using routinely collected data. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted, adaptable intervention package to implement four targeted, high impact recommendations in general practice. METHODS/DESIGN: The research programme Action to Support Practice Implement Research Evidence (ASPIRE) includes a pair of pragmatic cluster-randomised trials which use a balanced incomplete block design. Clusters are general practices in West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (UK), recruited using an 'opt-out' recruitment process. The intervention package adapted to each recommendation includes combinations of audit and feedback, educational outreach visits and computerised prompts with embedded behaviour change techniques selected on the basis of identified needs and barriers to change. In trial 1, practices are randomised to adapted interventions targeting either diabetes control or risky prescribing and those in trial 2 to adapted interventions targeting either blood pressure control in patients at risk of cardiovascular events or anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. The respective primary endpoints comprise achievement of all recommended target levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure and cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes, a composite indicator of risky prescribing, achievement of recommended blood pressure targets for specific patient groups and anticoagulation prescribing in patients with atrial fibrillation. We are also randomising practices to a fifth, non-intervention control group to further assess Hawthorne effects. Outcomes will be assessed using routinely collected data extracted 1 year after randomisation. Economic modelling will estimate intervention cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation involving eight non-trial practices will examine intervention delivery, mechanisms of action and unintended consequences. DISCUSSION: ASPIRE will provide 'real-world' evidence about the effects, cost-effectiveness and delivery of adapted intervention packages targeting high impact recommendations. By implementing our adaptable intervention package across four distinct clinical topics, and using 'opt-out' recruitment, our findings will provide evidence of wider generalisability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN91989345.
Publisher PDF
Peer reviewed
11
eng
Implementation Science
© Willis et al. 2016. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Primary care
Implementation
Cluster-randomised trial
Clinical guidelines
Diabetes
Prescribing
Atrial fibrillation
RA Public aspects of medicine
H Social Sciences
HD28 Management. Industrial Management
ZA Information resources
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
RA
H
HD28
ZA
Action to Support Practices Implement Research Evidence (ASPIRE) : protocol for a cluster-randomised evaluation of adaptable implementation packages targeting 'high impact' clinical practice recommendations in general practice
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/67882022-09-25T11:30:13Zcom_10023_1949com_10023_39com_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_1950col_10023_90col_10023_880
Myrseth, Kristian Ove
Wollbrant, Conny
University of St Andrews. School of Management
University of St Andrews. Centre for Responsible Banking and Finance
University of St Andrews. School of Economics and Finance
2015-06-09T08:40:07Z
2015-06-09T08:40:07Z
2015-05
Myrseth , K O & Wollbrant , C 2015 , ' Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option : Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) ' , Judgment and Decision Making , vol. 10 , no. 3 , pp. 277-279 . < http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.html >
1930-2975
PURE: 189094207
PURE UUID: 27627da3-fa25-4b15-a29c-aaf1664da08b
Scopus: 84930352511
WOS: 000355331200007
ORCID: /0000-0003-1147-3025/work/119628642
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/6788
http://journal.sjdm.org/vol10.3.html
http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.html
Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the reflexive, default behavior. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to discriminate between reflexive versus cognitively controlled behavioral responses. This is because cognitive conflict can emanate from resisting impulse successfully—or unsuccessfully.
Publisher PDF
Peer reviewed
eng
Judgment and Decision Making
Copyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Social dilemma
Cooperation
Intuition
Cognitive conflict
Self-control
HM Sociology
BC Logic
HM
BC
Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option : Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014)
Journal item
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/134642022-04-14T15:32:27Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
Ward, Vicky
Pinkney, Lisa
Fry, Gary
University of St Andrews. School of Management
2018-05-22T14:30:07Z
2018-05-22T14:30:07Z
2016-09-08
Ward , V , Pinkney , L & Fry , G 2016 , ' Developing a framework for gathering and using service user experiences to improve integrated health and social care : the SUFFICE framework ' , BMC Research Notes , vol. 9 , 437 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2230-0
1756-0500
PURE: 253148003
PURE UUID: 329f8eda-046a-4ec1-89c2-cbf8e8e93a03
PubMed: 27609366
PubMedCentral: PMC5017127
Scopus: 84986556255
ORCID: /0000-0001-8684-0403/work/64361453
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13464
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2230-0
This project was supported by the National Institute of Health Research (KRD/012/001/006) and by the Leeds South and East Clinical Commissioning group.
BACKGROUND: More people than ever receive care and support from health and social care services. Initiatives to integrate the work of health and social care staff have increased rapidly across the UK but relatively little has been done to chart and improve their impact on service users. Our aim was to develop a framework for gathering and using service user feedback to improve integrated health and social care in one locality in the North of England. METHODS: We used published literature and interviews with health and social care managers to determine the expected service user experiences of local community-based integrated teams and the ways in which team members were expected to work together. We used the results to devise qualitative data collection and analysis tools for gathering and analyzing service user feedback. We used developmental evaluation and service improvement methodologies to devise a procedure for developing service improvement plans. FINDINGS: We identified six expected service user experiences of integrated care and 15 activities that health and social care teams were expected to undertake. We used these to develop logic models and tools for collecting and analysing service user experiences. These include a narrative interview schedule, a plan for analyzing data, and a method for synthesizing the results into a composite 'story'. We devised a structured service improvement procedure which involves teams of health and social care staff listening to a composite service user story, identifying how their actions as a team may have contributed to the story and developing a service improvement plan. CONCLUSIONS: This framework aims to put service user experiences at the heart of efforts to improve integration. It has been developed in collaboration with National Health Service (NHS) and Social Care managers. We expect it to be useful for evaluating and improving integrated care initiatives elsewhere.
Publisher PDF
Peer reviewed
11
eng
BMC Research Notes
© 2016 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Integrated care
Service user experience
Health care
Social care
Service improvement
RA Public aspects of medicine
H Social Sciences
HD28 Management. Industrial Management
ZA Information resources
RA
H
HD28
ZA
Developing a framework for gathering and using service user experiences to improve integrated health and social care : the SUFFICE framework
Journal article
oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/119962024-03-14T00:38:38Zcom_10023_89com_10023_27com_10023_879com_10023_878col_10023_90col_10023_880
Nutley, Sandra Margaret
Bain, Roderick
Moran, Clare
Orr, Kevin Martin
Russell, Shona Louise
Orr, Kevin
Nutley, Sandra
Russell, Shona
Bain, Rod
Hacking, Bonnie
Moran, Clare
University of St Andrews. School of Management
2017-11-06T08:47:25Z
2017-11-06T08:47:25Z
2016-05-03
2017-11-03
243407384
87ff39b6-12e8-43eb-84eb-e18b62825515
84978445306
Nutley , S M , Bain , R , Moran , C , Orr , K M & Russell , S L 2016 , Exploring and mapping the knowledge and practice terrain . in K Orr , S Nutley , S Russell , R Bain , B Hacking & C Moran (eds) , Knowledge and Practice in Business and Organisations . Routledge Taylor & Francis Group , New York and London , pp. 234-246 .
978-1-138-94085-7
9781315674025
ORCID: /0000-0003-3024-3997/work/81797636
ORCID: /0000-0002-3473-5019/work/41192207
https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11996
https://www.routledge.com/9781138940857
313859
eng
Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
Knowledge and Practice in Business and Organisations
HD28 Management. Industrial Management
HD28
Exploring and mapping the knowledge and practice terrain
Book item